{"id": "c1102", "title": "C1102 — Preserve adopted draft versions and clarify register scope", "filename": "C1102.md", "role": "Research action", "step": 1102, "sha256": "127f864d2aa068bb2468f417f3cadde394009da678614b9b611538a671264c38", "bytes": 1756, "origins": ["C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json#C1102"], "download": "/sources/127f864d2aa068bb2468f417f3cadde394009da678614b9b611538a671264c38.md", "format": "md", "derived": true, "tags": ["Inverse", "Covenant"], "excerpt": "Can the adoption history replay exactly while retaining subsequent editorial clarification?", "content": "# C1102 — Preserve adopted draft versions and clarify register scope\n\n## Question\n\nCan the adoption history replay exactly while retaining subsequent editorial clarification?\n\n## Inputs\n\n```json\n{}\n```\n\n## Sources\n\n```json\n[\n  \"C1090–C1095\",\n  \"C1058\",\n  \"independent inverse review\",\n  \"evidence/VERSIONED_INPUTS.json\"\n]\n```\n\n## Opened utc\n\n2026-09-28T04:21:27.098320+00:00\n\n## Results\n\n```json\n{\n  \"version_bindings\": [\n    {\n      \"path\": \"evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v1.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"2192ba1700420439ca53813be08474790a27a916d2ef9a8d0c97d051171f8aa7\",\n      \"bytes\": 9849\n    },\n    {\n      \"path\": \"evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v2.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"b2355a41f23ad18fd9d780c626b5f92f2acc43f6a384082328e1cb1eeec7cb91\",\n      \"bytes\": 9869\n    }\n  ],\n  \"changed_metadata_fields\": [\n    \"scope_note\"\n  ],\n  \"correction_ledger\": {\n    \"path\": \"model/adoption_and_scope_corrections.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"926054d0d54450a9053ff679bed38aeb9205a7760b67592e5957683c8d6d633d\",\n    \"bytes\": 752\n  }\n}\n```\n\n## Finding\n\nExact adopted draft versions now remain available for replay. The completed-path register wording is also clarified: its1400 and600 components retain two zeros; the earlier two-component theorem has a narrower register.\n\n## Reassessment\n\nAssemble the complete reader draft using immutable sections and explicit editorial corrections.\n\n## Checks\n\n```json\n{\n  \"only_scope_note_changed\": true,\n  \"bodies_unchanged\": true,\n  \"original_hashes\": true,\n  \"general_operation\": true\n}\n```\n\n## Closed utc\n\n2026-09-28T04:21:27.099310+00:00\n\n## Record provenance\n\nExact record hash: `5ad7f0fb25188aabd9cf6ed53dbb2f3dfb4498d734e998931ddbe0ce934657bf`\n\nSource journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`", "journalDownload": "/sources/f6bdc7aaaaa4fd40f1151b367204ddee7f0f9b77a9c43ae8764831b52d862670.json", "evidenceLinks": [{"id": "d-2192ba1700420439", "title": "evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v1.json"}, {"id": "d-b2355a41f23ad18f", "title": "evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v2.json"}, {"id": "d-926054d0d54450a9", "title": "model/adoption_and_scope_corrections.json"}, {"id": "d-f7fd9fd6aca48ef8", "title": "evidence/VERSIONED_INPUTS.json"}]}