{"id": "c918", "title": "C918 — Reconcile the six independent domain reviews", "filename": "C918.md", "role": "Research action", "step": 918, "sha256": "e5903c901e9a5cb5a3fbd3d5d5104a8762a9810f5e1d1f9cf323f059f6e0fc8a", "bytes": 1985, "origins": ["C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0832_C0931/journal.json#C918"], "download": "/sources/e5903c901e9a5cb5a3fbd3d5d5104a8762a9810f5e1d1f9cf323f059f6e0fc8a.md", "format": "md", "derived": true, "tags": [], "excerpt": "Which review findings require a change to the final explanation?", "content": "# C918 — Reconcile the six independent domain reviews\n\n## Question\n\nWhich review findings require a change to the final explanation?\n\n## Inputs\n\n```json\n{}\n```\n\n## Sources\n\n```json\n[\n  \"independent reviews C832–C910\"\n]\n```\n\n## Opened utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:02:14.936182+00:00\n\n## Results\n\n```json\n{\n  \"review_reconciliation\": {\n    \"path\": \"evidence/REVIEW_RECONCILIATION_C918.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"f15cfb3669781848041b2b44a0495571abec3dc1f053d567337c459af67490cc\",\n    \"bytes\": 1838\n  },\n  \"review_checks\": 170,\n  \"refinements\": [\n    {\n      \"from\": \"C909 digit information\",\n      \"resolution\": \"original span plus fixed base10/placeholder policy computes the register; C913 distinguishes primitive and derived state\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"from\": \"C907 retained branch held field\",\n      \"resolution\": \"both constructions hold outer endpoints; only the retention branch holds the original biography. C898 and C906 numeric comparison already distinguishes them\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"from\": \"C869 literal_field check label\",\n      \"resolution\": \"the12-boundary coarsening is derived; only its source four-boundary chiasm is literal\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"from\": \"C834 daily allocation\",\n      \"resolution\": \"uniform non-bull daily allocation is an explicit reconstruction assumption, not inferred from marginal totals\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n## Finding\n\nAll independent domain checks pass. Four presentation refinements keep computed state, retained biographies, derived grids and assumed daily allocation correctly classified. No completed numerical field requires repair.\n\n## Reassessment\n\nAdopt the readable synthesis with these qualifications and precise source language.\n\n## Checks\n\n```json\n{\n  \"six_reviews\": true,\n  \"all_positive\": true,\n  \"four_refinements\": true\n}\n```\n\n## Closed utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:02:14.937054+00:00\n\n## Record provenance\n\nExact record hash: `728a62dedc3b105fde400e99e2660fb85491eece2b58d48f725c4934945de07a`\n\nSource journal: `Research_Cycles/C0832_C0931/journal.json`", "journalDownload": "/sources/6a37be4e218f9f467cbde5e9db3723ce9c79dc78cc97d1a289422b96cb9971e0.json", "evidenceLinks": [{"id": "d-f15cfb3669781848", "title": "evidence/REVIEW_RECONCILIATION_C918.json"}]}