{"id": "c985", "title": "C985 — First calibration and allocation pair", "filename": "C985.md", "role": "Research action", "step": 985, "sha256": "9925f74644ef89957d82e7f2ccdb7146beb2ffea6c07d32dde7020717585bbdb", "bytes": 891, "origins": ["C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json#C985"], "download": "/sources/9925f74644ef89957d82e7f2ccdb7146beb2ffea6c07d32dde7020717585bbdb.md", "format": "md", "derived": true, "tags": ["Calendar Keys"], "excerpt": "What factors satisfy the336/360 calibration and last-sixth completion identity?", "content": "# C985 — First calibration and allocation pair\n\n## Question\n\nWhat factors satisfy the336/360 calibration and last-sixth completion identity?\n\n## Inputs\n\n```json\n{}\n```\n\n## Sources\n\n```json\n[\n  \"C984\",\n  \"File63 §1.3\"\n]\n```\n\n## Opened utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:52:35.242556+00:00\n\n## Results\n\n```json\n{\n  \"solution\": [\n    \"25/23\",\n    \"70/69\"\n  ],\n  \"determinant\": -1656\n}\n```\n\n## Finding\n\nThese two retained relations uniquely recover E=25/23 and P=70/69. This is a backward constraint basis for already established relations.\n\n## Reassessment\n\nCheck whether the second calendar/partition pair demands the same E.\n\n## Checks\n\n```json\n{\n  \"unique\": true,\n  \"ratios\": true\n}\n```\n\n## Closed utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:52:35.246593+00:00\n\n## Record provenance\n\nExact record hash: `ca1fb687d526fe397b7dd51e4fbe9b6b7b9fea5bb7c7800f1675d698437aa5df`\n\nSource journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`", "journalDownload": "/sources/f6bdc7aaaaa4fd40f1151b367204ddee7f0f9b77a9c43ae8764831b52d862670.json", "evidenceLinks": [{"id": "d-180803601a2db301", "title": "File 63"}]}