{"id": "c989", "title": "C989 — Predicted allocation fraction", "filename": "C989.md", "role": "Research action", "step": 989, "sha256": "70103ee31c09ddac5a39cb096935333ad9a36c9a7fed5ccb0ea2682731f1f76d", "bytes": 938, "origins": ["C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json#C989"], "download": "/sources/70103ee31c09ddac5a39cb096935333ad9a36c9a7fed5ccb0ea2682731f1f76d.md", "format": "md", "derived": true, "tags": [], "excerpt": "Which E allocation corresponds to the calibrated364-day factor?", "content": "# C989 — Predicted allocation fraction\n\n## Question\n\nWhich E allocation corresponds to the calibrated364-day factor?\n\n## Inputs\n\n```json\n{}\n```\n\n## Sources\n\n```json\n[\n  \"C985\",\n  \"C988\"\n]\n```\n\n## Opened utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:53:06.108565+00:00\n\n## Results\n\n```json\n{\n  \"E_from_first_pair\": \"25/23\",\n  \"J_from_calibration\": \"300/299\",\n  \"implied_selected_fraction\": \"1/26\"\n}\n```\n\n## Finding\n\nThe first pair plus364 implies the1/26 allocation. The source’s25:1 partition supplies the corresponding cut; this is an explored-source consistency relation.\n\n## Reassessment\n\nUse a predeclared alternate fraction to show compatibility is not automatic.\n\n## Checks\n\n```json\n{\n  \"fraction\": true,\n  \"source_partition\": true\n}\n```\n\n## Closed utc\n\n2026-09-28T03:53:06.108918+00:00\n\n## Record provenance\n\nExact record hash: `7e7b49c53b5d12c663cebd76338097a9e9a1cc49685e7d7baefe870a48b2e202`\n\nSource journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`", "journalDownload": "/sources/f6bdc7aaaaa4fd40f1151b367204ddee7f0f9b77a9c43ae8764831b52d862670.json"}