Reader architecture and family-map review

Status: PASS with small reader revisions. No blocking or arithmetic issue was found. The map, caption and relationship table positively explain how the families fit together through complete source constructions. They keep separate source roles visible without making limitations the main story.

The review checked 40 frozen source/model/artifact bindings and 24 numerical or structural conditions. The full PNG was visually inspected: all six four-node lanes are readable, with no clipping or crossed arrows. Input SHA256 values and exact checks are in the companion JSON.

The explanatory argument

The strongest new connections are the complete SP birth-capacity-to-lifespan construction; the Rounded Moses path’s contribution to File52c’s three original words; and the ordinary row grammar’s explanation of different Regular, Cumulative and NT birth responses. The two source mechanisms in the Regular kernel add a useful bridge: located row changes produce 1250/650, whereas T/C/S choices produce the 405 placement field. Their coefficient-five relation is an additional source calibration.

The six lanes are appropriate as constructions, not a claim that every family derives from a single numerical dataset. The shared argument is that named inputs, measurements and operation order generate complete fields. The map contains two particularly concrete cross-family paths—SP cap to rectangle and Rounded Moses to inverse—while the remaining lanes show how the same measurement method applies to other source objects.

Small revisions for the final copy

• kernel bridge: The prose describes the row-change staircase but leaves the other newly explained Regular mechanism implicit. The map relationship table now contains it. Suggested text: “The same sources also supply three finite placement choices: Terah 60, Cainan 130 and Sojourn 215, whose eight combinations span 405 years. This placement family and the 1250/650 row-change staircase meet through the source calibration C=1.3u and T=0.6u at u=100; they arise from different source operations.”

• plural source title: The argument uses a common kind of labelled structure across genealogies and count objects, rather than one literal source dataset for every lane. Suggested text: “Shared source structures, different chronological measurements”

• residual register: Retaining exact residuals is the reconstruction register used here. It should not sound like a claim that the source Rounded chronology itself explicitly stores every residual. Suggested text: “Our reconstruction retains both the nearest-five value of each row and its exact residual.”

• strict actual partition: Name the strict Actual source state when presenting 129|801, so the reader does not combine it with the standard 4114 comparison used elsewhere. Suggested text: “In the strict Actual state used for this path, the corresponding partition is 129 and 801.”

• caption anchor scope: The opening briefly says the Rounded Moses path supplies the original words; the next paragraph correctly adds the File52c source event nodes. State this joint input immediately. Suggested text: “The Rounded Moses path joins File52c’s supplied event nodes to recover the three original Regular component words.”

Claim and source status

The proposed reader table is prep/claim_source_status_C1315.md; its JSON companion retains full source sections, source hashes and adopted-action references. It distinguishes source premises, exact calculations, conditional mechanisms and interpretive comparisons. Its eight rows can sit after the overview or become a compact appendix.

The current map correctly carries the three critical source conditions: File52c supplies the extra inverse event nodes; the SP rectangle retains its placement and distinct openings; and the NT comparison concerns births while the seven lifespan differences belong to the source genealogies. Native Cainan remains a named inserted row. The Covenant first join, shared-life second join and retained-147 third join are distinguished.

Shared source inputs do not count again as independent testimony when their outputs agree. The reconstructions explain how results follow together, including which additional source condition is required. The proposed architecture preserves that distinction and makes no historical-origin or statistical-independence claim.

No existing source, journal, model, diagram or deliverable was modified.