from research import *
refinements={'MT_regular_Noah':(1650,[1050,600]),'MT_cumulative_Shem':(9170,[8570,600]),'MT_cumulative_Noah':(9170,[7620,1550]),'LXX_regular_Noah':(2250,[1650,600])}
s=begin(496,'Refinement defects','When do documented refinements preserve the reversed path value?',refinements,['File52c §3.3','C489'])
r={k:sum(inv(x) for x in parts)-inv(whole) for k,(whole,parts) in refinements.items()}
finish(s,{'defects':r,'definition':'delta_refinement=sum I(parts)-I(sum parts)'},
'The MT regular refinement has defect0; both cumulative refinements and the LXX regular refinement have defect990. Thus12026 versus13016 and10436 versus11426 are outcomes of the same path rule, not separate arbitrary anchors.',
'Test whether appending the documented Conquest-to-Nativity leg gives a uniform backbone continuation.',{'raw_lengths_preserved':all(w==sum(p) for w,p in refinements.values()),'defects':list(r.values())==[0,990,990,990]})
Evidence
s496.py
Linked sources and evidence
Edition and provenance
s496.py
SHA-256 05892bd48935829e7687928a99c130f69528715f67d672bf2689f30356c9d1ce
C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0482_C0531/evidence/s496.py