questions.json

{
  "status": "Questions frozen before new diagnostic computations; preparation only, no numbered actions.",
  "scope": "New explanatory compression beyond C505–511,C568–586,C665–702,C872–889; retain all prior limits.",
  "questions": [
    {"id":"KQ01","question":"Which completed results are premises rather than new discoveries for this packet?","object":"Prior family index and selected results","new_burden":"Explicit novelty and dependency basis"},
    {"id":"KQ02","question":"Can the source five-to-one partition and336/360 calibration determine E and P uniquely?","object":"File62/63 dual490 plus File12 calendars","new_burden":"Solve for operators from independently stated partition and calendar measures"},
    {"id":"KQ03","question":"Does the source25-to-one partition with336/364 independently impose the same E?","object":"Actual12558 path and File12 calendars","new_burden":"Determine compatibility constraint rather than recount scalar equality"},
    {"id":"KQ04","question":"What is the rank and exact dependence of the four calibration/allocation equations?","object":"Three unknown Keys, four declared relations","new_burden":"Minimal independent equation basis"},
    {"id":"KQ05","question":"How many primitive choices remain if only common calibration is retained?","object":"Three-Key calibration system","new_burden":"Identify its free common-volume parameter without fitting endpoints"},
    {"id":"KQ06","question":"Can one source partition plus calendar ratios predict the other allocation fraction?","object":"Same fixed source packet","new_burden":"Conditional prediction of1/26 from1/6; explored-source compatibility, not a fresh holdout"},
    {"id":"KQ07","question":"Does a controlled replacement of the26-fold partition break that compatibility?","object":"Diagnostic25-fold comparison only","new_burden":"Show the source constraint is substantive without adopting the perturbation"},
    {"id":"KQ08","question":"Do the three allocation fractions form a coherent nested-selection triangle?","object":"A_f(k)=1+f(k−1)","new_burden":"Derive E-to-P,P-to-J,E-to-J and their dependency"},
    {"id":"KQ09","question":"How does nested selection differ from sequential chronological expansion?","object":"A_g(A_f(E)) versus multiplication of Keys","new_burden":"Separate allocation composition from Key-word composition"},
    {"id":"KQ10","question":"Which allocations are source-appointed cuts and which are only computed fractions?","object":"483,12558 and12600 source paths","new_burden":"Source-support ledger; no new target assignment"},
    {"id":"KQ11","question":"What exact part vector records the information erased when partial and uniform expansions share a total?","object":"Two-component path","new_burden":"Kernel formula independent of specific coordinates"},
    {"id":"KQ12","question":"Can the full source family be normalized to one component-defect form?","object":"483 and12558 source partitions plus9660|2940 retained-arm family","new_burden":"Whole-family rank and invariant, retaining inherited numbers as examples"},
    {"id":"KQ13","question":"When does coarsening commute with componentwise conversion for every possible weight vector?","object":"Fixed partition map and diagonal operator","new_burden":"Necessary and sufficient operator condition"},
    {"id":"KQ14","question":"Can one supplied path hide a failure of universal coarsening compatibility?","object":"Same fixed source partitions","new_burden":"Distinguish a weight-dependent effective factor from an operator identity"},
    {"id":"KQ15","question":"What linear constraint generates the whole native/P/E retained-part output field?","object":"Complete SupplementA690/30 table and12600/12740/13440 paths","new_burden":"Rank-two reconstruction with one dependent output"},
    {"id":"KQ16","question":"Can the converted component and retained component be recovered from two total measurements?","object":"Native total andP total","new_burden":"Invertible measurement pair and explicit source-role limit"},
    {"id":"KQ17","question":"Which apparent calendar-completion checks become dependent under that recovery?","object":"Same complete fields","new_burden":"Minimal consistency ledger, no inflated witness tally"},
    {"id":"KQ18","question":"Does the primitive529 ladder determine the four elementary increment coefficients, and which are independent?","object":"Known529→575→625 duration ladder","new_burden":"Constraint-basis classification rather than re-running ladder"},
    {"id":"KQ19","question":"How do source-appointed pivots enter a finite affine composition as one rational congruence condition?","object":"Two general reduced ratios with fixed integer pivots","new_burden":"Unified affine prefix-domain formulation beyond same-origin words"},
    {"id":"KQ20","question":"What determines whether a whole finite source field shares an admissible affine-prefix residue?","object":"Fixed labelled point field","new_burden":"Difference lattice plus one placement residue; no pivot search"},
    {"id":"KQ21","question":"Can width and placement constraints be represented as separate coordinates without losing tags?","object":"Existing C480 pair and fixed12026 comparison","new_burden":"Explicit recoverable field normal form; source pivots unchanged"},
    {"id":"KQ22","question":"What is the minimal lattice carrying every fixed diagnostic image when integer closure fails?","object":"File46 five-head field and declaredE anchor","new_burden":"Exact output grid denominator instead of repairing dates"},
    {"id":"KQ23","question":"How does source translation transport the affine congruence field?","object":"Whole-frame translation with anchor tags","new_burden":"Domain covariance on full fields, citing inherited affine identity"},
    {"id":"KQ24","question":"What is the smallest explanatory basis supported by all these fixed objects?","object":"Key/calendar/allocation/shape/placement dependency map","new_burden":"Compact source-constraint ledger; no unique-global-minimality claim"}
  ]
}