s951.py

from research import *
s=begin(951,'First reassessment checkpoint','Which work now best advances the family-level explanation?',{},['C932–C950','File18 §3.1.3'])
review={'completed_block':'junction compression','strongest_new_results':['regular fixed-register theorem','cumulative two-branch theorem','finite-box aggregate identifiability','component non-identifiability'],'next_family':'complete SP antediluvian lifespan cap with fixed native birth rows','reason':'tests a compact source-wide rule and asks what missing row values can be recovered','deferred':['additional endpoint searches','second decimal inversion','historical mechanism claims']}
a=artifact('model/checkpoint_951.json',json.dumps(review,indent=2)+'\n')
finish(s,{'checkpoint':a,'numbered_actions_so_far':20},'The junction now has a smaller explanatory basis. The best next move is a different whole-source family that can test rule transfer and recoverability.','Freeze the nine SP birth rows and the lifespan-cap prediction before inspecting its rowwise residuals.',{'twenty_actions':951-932+1==20,'no_target_hunt':'additional endpoint searches' in review['deferred']})