from research import *
s=begin(622,'Revise the synthesis after independent review','Can the draft make the causal connections clearer while preserving every stated source distinction?',{'review':'REVIEW_DRAFT_C618.md','changes':['483 explanation','475 status','grid parameters','weekly distance rule','supplemented basis and normalized map']},['C618–C621; independent draft review'])
text=(ROOT/'model/draft_c618.md').read_text()
edits={
'**Integrated working synthesis through C617 · 28 September 2026**':'**Integrated working synthesis · C532–C631 research cycle · 28 September 2026**',
'The common integral input lattice is equally compact:':'The carrier itself connects these calculations to the Covenant and clutch families: $483=12\\times40.25=3\\times161$. Its split $402.5+80.5=(10+2)\\times40.25$ makes the one-sixth portion explicit. E on the whole483 gains $42=3\\times14$; E on80.5 gains7. The same161-unit and its fourteen-year expansion gain therefore appear at different, explicitly counted scales.\n\nThe common integral input lattice is equally compact:',
'mixing J on the first arm with E on the second gives $300+175=475$.':'mixing J on the first arm with E on the second gives the **diagnostic total** $300+175=475$, not a source-appointed terminal.',
'using civil coordinates $a(B\\text{ BC})=1-B$ and $a(\\text{AD }A)=A$.':'with $j=0,\\ldots,49$ and $r\\in\\{-110,0\\}$, using civil coordinates $a(B\\text{ BC})=1-B$ and $a(\\text{AD }A)=A$.',
'The primary weekly cells use10D,8D, and 6D+70:':'With $D=7g+110$ (600 or614), the primary weekly cells use accumulated distances $10D$, $8D$, and $6D+70$; subtract64 to obtain the corresponding birth BC labels:',
'They are an explicit relation inventory, not a formally proved connected graph. The compact source-basis file records central premises but is not a complete standalone replacement for the sources.':'A supplementary map groups them under consistent module names and records their connectivity while retaining each relation type. The source register now supplements the core premises with fixed comparison dates, phase displays, weekly residuals and the full attribution table. It remains a guide to the source records, not a replacement for them.'
}
for a,b in edits.items():
assert text.count(a)==1,(a,text.count(a));text=text.replace(a,b)
text+='\n## Research basis\n\nThis is a new explanatory draft, not an edit to a canonical source. It extends the C531 synthesis using Files60–63 and68–69, while the latest supplied File52c remains controlling for the rounded chronology. The accompanying C532–C631 journal records each question, result and reassessment; the evidence archive includes source snapshots, exact scripts, the completed input register, diagrams and independent review notes. Reconstruction counts are dependent outputs, not independent discoveries. The100 bounded steps include research, synthesis, review and verification.\n'
meta=artifact('deliverables/490d_Chronological_Families_Integrated_Draft_20260928.md',text)
finish(s,{'draft':meta,'word_count':len(text.split()),'review_changes_applied':len(edits)},'The revised draft foregrounds the Actual/Rounded bridge and explains how483 carries the161/14 structure into both allocation identities. Parameters and diagnostic status are now explicit without expanding the scope-control discussion.','Bind the principal explanatory claims to exact equations and source locators.',{'review_changes':len(edits)==6,'carrier_link':483==12*F(161,4)==3*161 and E*483-483==3*14})
Evidence
s622.py
Linked sources and evidence
Edition and provenance
s622.py
SHA-256 6e07c4c756e4236c0f6599fa502b251294bb755ab9f150af2345277918a2c697
C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0532_C0631/evidence/s622.py