s829.py

from research import *
s=begin(829,'Close the independent-review findings','Have the material review comments been resolved in the final account?',{},['REVIEW_C732_C742.md; REVIEW_C749_C770.md; REVIEW_C772_C790.md; REVIEW_C792_C810.md; REVIEW_INTEGRATED_DRAFT.md'])
names=['REVIEW_C732_C742.md','REVIEW_C749_C770.md','REVIEW_C772_C790.md','REVIEW_C792_C810.md','REVIEW_INTEGRATED_DRAFT.md'];bindings=[]
for n in names:
    p=ROOT/'evidence'/n;b=p.read_bytes();bindings.append({'path':'evidence/'+n,'sha256':hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest(),'bytes':len(b)})
doc=(ROOT/'deliverables/490d_Chronological_Families_Integrated_Synthesis_C831.md').read_text()
resolved={'common430_native215':'native 215' in doc,'derived_transfer':'derived transfers' in doc,'conditional_SP_route':'remains conditional' in doc,'official_SP145':'official SP Terah 145' in doc,'BJ_reconstructed_refinement':'reconstructed biological/sacrifice path' in doc,'no_double40':'not added a second time' in doc,'comparison_Shem':'source-implied comparison coordinates' in doc}
finish(s,{'review_bindings':bindings,'resolved_qualifications':resolved},'Five independent review notes are bound to the record. Their material scope and wording points are present in the final synthesis; no numerical repair was required.','Write the restart checkpoint with the completed explanatory model and next research boundary.',{'all_resolved':all(resolved.values()),'five_reviews':len(bindings)==5})