Evidence

s1368.py

Download source fileOpen in research workspace
from research import *
s=begin(1368,"Write grouping and count compatibility","When does grouping retain a symmetry as well as a total?",{},["C1009–C1029","C1266–C1272","C1309"])
t=json.loads("\"## 7. Counts, grouping and symmetry\\n\\nAn ordered prefix map with its full selected basis is an invertible integer encoding of the source counts. For Esau, the six clean prefixes, third and fifth female prefixes, and grand total recover all nine counts by addition and subtraction. This is a complete alternative description of nine numerical inputs, not their derivation from fewer independent values.\\n\\nA grouping \\\\(g\\\\) carries an operation \\\\(r\\\\) to the grouped object precisely when\\n\\n\\\\[\\ng(i)=g(j)\\\\ \\\\Longrightarrow\\\\ g(r(i))=g(r(j)).\\n\\\\]\\n\\nThe condition says that one group cannot acquire two different images. For Toledot, occurrences 9 and 10 share Esau’s section. Reflection \\\\(r(i)=12-i\\\\) sends them to 3 and 2, distinct sections. Reflection therefore does not descend to the ten-section grouping. Giving Esau multiplicity two still preserves the eleven-occurrence measure.\\n\\nThe NT primary path has 77 edges of seventy years. Grouping them into eleven complete seven-edge blocks preserves duration and reverses block order under reflection, retaining twelve block boundaries. The separately displayed AD65–135 extension is outside that primary object.\\n\\nFor the NT Key knot, if \\\\(u\\\\) is slot width and \\\\(w\\\\) the selected radius, the two comparison equations reduce to the same relation \\\\(w=69u\\\\). The separate placement \\\\(35u=2450\\\\) fixes \\\\(u=70\\\\), then \\\\(w=4830\\\\). Thus two displayed Key landings do not provide two independent scale conditions.\\n\\nOn the shared-name birth comparison, define \\\\(D_i=NT_i-S_i\\\\). With coordinates decreasing toward later births,\\n\\n\\\\[\\nD_{i+1}-D_i=(S_i-S_{i+1})-(NT_i-NT_{i+1}).\\n\\\\]\\n\\nAll twenty-one edges follow this recurrence. Omitting Cainan from the shared-name display leaves an NT gap of 140 between Arphaxad and Shelah. Native LXX retains intervals 135 and 130 and changes the successive comparison values by 65 and 60.\\n\\nSource/proof route: inherited structural-count and NT-knot models; C1266–C1272; grouping relation C1309.\\n\"")
a=artifact("draft/technical_07_counts.md",t)
finish(s,{'artifact':a,'words':len(t.split())},"The count supplement states the exact grouping criterion and explains why preserving multiplicity does not automatically preserve reflection.","Write a compact source-state reference table.",{'nonempty':len(t)>100,'reflection_witness':12-9==3 and 12-10==2})
Edition and provenance

s1368.py

SHA-256 8dc43d084f59c6934ef0cd23a1431d704b9b6b84aae58458cb598b3bba2880f6

C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/evidence/s1368.py