Final narrow synthesis review

Reviewer: grammar-review agent. Date:28 September2026. Reviewed C619–C625 scripts and their model/deliverable artifacts, the revised integrated draft, and the short reading guide. No draft, journal or step script was edited.

All six C622 changes are present: the cycle heading, the483/161 carrier explanation, explicit diagnostic status for475, complete grid parameters, definition of the weekly carrier and−64 coordinate offset, and the updated input-register/graph description. The principal Actual/Rounded paths, generated1404 endpoint,525/13 interior discrepancy, local+2 pair adjustment,989 bridge unit and current SP paragraph remain arithmetically and semantically consistent with the reviewed records. J is correctly named Enochian in the deliverables.

Independently recomputed the graph topology from family_graph_normalized.json: all8 modules occur in15 typed/evidenced edges, and all8 are reachable when direction is ignored. The artifact explicitly describes this as a module-level relation graph and denies universal event transport or automatically authorized composition. The final draft does not promote this organizational connectivity into a new chronology theorem.

Read source_basis_completed.json and checked its supplement against the cited packet tables. It includes fixed Joseph/Joshua comparisons, the separate whole-year3 and exact7/2 phase offsets, weekly counts/residuals/overlays, and a reference to all18 attribution rows with72 head coordinates. All three referenced source-table files are present. The draft accurately presents the register as a supplemented guide to retained source choices rather than a short standalone replacement for the sources.

One final source-domain wording refinement

In §6, the phrase “D=7g+110 (600 or614), the primary weekly cells use10D,8D,and6D+70” could suggest that the source supplies the complete strict614 companion table. It supplies the primary600 table and separate bounded companion transports. Prefer:

For the primary weekly table, D=7×70+110=600. Its accumulated distances are10D,8D,and6D+70; subtract64 to obtain the corresponding birth BC labels.

The following140-year Lukan transport paragraph already describes the companion scope correctly. This refinement requires no new calculation and no expansion of the control discussion.

Readiness: no numerical correction or broader re-audit is needed. With the primary-weekly wording clarified, the integrated explanation, reading guide and model framing are ready for the root's final packaging and closure checks. This review confirms content readiness; it does not claim completion of the later C627–C631 packaging steps.