{
"status": "Questions fixed before exploratory calculations for this new preparation packet",
"created_utc": "2026-09-28T05:21:52.377132+00:00",
"root_step_status_at_assignment": 1181,
"questions": [
{
"id": "RJ01",
"question": "Which complete source rows permit the ordinary compatibility equation L=b+r?",
"next_test": "Freeze55 ordinary rows and exclude SP Jared/Methuselah/Lamech inclusive ledgers."
},
{
"id": "RJ02",
"question": "Which data are truly retained in the joint observation packet?",
"next_test": "Freeze exact L and separately observed B=Q(b),R=Q(r); keep original source b,r in a separate verification register."
},
{
"id": "RJ03",
"question": "What is the complete integer fibre of exact L,B,R?",
"next_test": "Derive interval intersection and balanced residual formula; do not inspect hidden b,r."
},
{
"id": "RJ04",
"question": "What does that same inverse return for every eligible source row?",
"next_test": "Apply to all55 fixed ordinary rows and compare to hidden source truth only afterward."
},
{
"id": "RJ05",
"question": "Does rounded total Q(L) add a new constraint when L is already exact?",
"next_test": "Identify functional dependence; contrast triple-rounded fibres without exact L."
},
{
"id": "RJ06",
"question": "What additional row measurement removes the remaining ambiguity?",
"next_test": "State one residual or one linear contrast condition, and expose derived-input tautology."
},
{
"id": "RJ07",
"question": "What can the neighbouring Methuselah, Reu, Lamech and Cainan cases actually establish?",
"next_test": "Explain singleton versus unresolved fibres without promoting derived remainders into independent evidence."
},
{
"id": "RJ08",
"question": "Can every admitted row shift act on rounded values alone?",
"next_test": "Prove universal descent iff the shift is a multiple of5; retain branch-specific exceptions as conditional."
},
{
"id": "RJ09",
"question": "How do rounded values and residuals compose under source shifts?",
"next_test": "Derive the exact carry lift and composition identity."
},
{
"id": "RJ10",
"question": "Does the carry lift preserve all observed ordinary inter-tradition row changes?",
"next_test": "Test35 matched MT→LXX or MT→ordinary-SP rows in b,r,L streams, with all source values and exclusions visible."
},
{
"id": "RJ11",
"question": "Why does the LXX Lamech change move rounded remainder and rounded total differently?",
"next_test": "Use source life displacement−24 and its distinct starting residuals; no arbitrary shift search."
},
{
"id": "RJ12",
"question": "What does rounding the cap retain and lose globally?",
"next_test": "Derive exact integer fibre for T=Q(min(L,c)) at a fixed integer capacity."
},
{
"id": "RJ13",
"question": "Does rounding commute with capping when both arguments use the same rounded representation?",
"next_test": "Prove monotone min identity; distinguish keeping an unrounded capacity."
},
{
"id": "RJ14",
"question": "What are the complete nine source cap-plus-round fibres?",
"next_test": "Bind exact births/capacities and all nine capped outputs; show bounded cells versus saturation rays."
},
{
"id": "RJ15",
"question": "How do exact cap loss and rounding residual combine?",
"next_test": "Derive complementarity and exact reconstruction; compute all nine rows and cumulative suffix responses."
},
{
"id": "RJ16",
"question": "Are cap loss and rounding residual two independent missing quantities on each known branch?",
"next_test": "On strict active support, recover capped residual from capacity; on inactive support loss is zero."
},
{
"id": "RJ17",
"question": "What minimum source-supported observations would close the remaining whole-family losses?",
"next_test": "Separate three unbounded excesses from six finite residual choices; cost total constraints and known exact outputs conditionally."
},
{
"id": "RJ18",
"question": "What explanatory gain survives after source-input and inherited-result costs are counted?",
"next_test": "State the new fibre/composite results, reuse old forward identities, and retain source roles and historical limits."
}
],
"guards": [
"No numbered root actions",
"No second decimal inversion",
"No endpoint search or new target tally",
"Candidate fibre members are formal compatible integers, not source variants",
"Derived r=L−b is not independently attested by this packet"
]
}
Evidence
round joint fibres.questions.json
Edition and provenance
round_joint_fibres.questions.json
SHA-256 d71176b923f00b784eb5a4755454f04822042cd63395257c8314505aa42409f8
C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/prep/round_joint_fibres.questions.json