{
"status": "Frozen source-based interface inputs; no numbered action",
"question_manifest_sha256": "f969fcc767370cc7bbc122e8314f7891a83cc54c0d38d40ae6074378579cb481",
"primary_source": {
"path": "/workspace/scratch/1b40da62dcbd/c932_c1131/evidence/sources/File52c_latest.md",
"sha256": "a5ea84562101158b60d0cf296765d6eff38e7a2abda4e74ad1b353dfd13b9530"
},
"key_packet": {
"path": "/workspace/scratch/1b40da62dcbd/c932_c1131/prep/key_constraints/sourcepacket.json",
"sha256": "11af99ef822dc676b504a83d732af04d01492ffa4048810e44865c0dfffc9e65"
},
"literal_paths_from_Nativity": {
"regular_Flood": [
1400,
1050,
1650
],
"regular_Noah": [
1400,
1650,
1050
],
"regular_Flood_Noah": [
1400,
1050,
600,
1050
],
"cumulative_primary": [
1400,
3430,
9170
]
},
"path_locators": {
"section": "File52c3.4",
"lines": [
396,
403
],
"text": "| Source path | Original successive spans | Inverted successive spans | Sum; endpoint from 6 BC |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Regular: 6 \u2192 1406 \u2192 2456 \u2192 4106 | 1400 + 1050 + 1650 | 4100 + 5010 + 5610 | 14720; 14726 BC |\n| Regular via Noah: 6 \u2192 1406 \u2192 3056 \u2192 4106 | 1400 + 1650 + 1050 | 4100 + 5610 + 5010 | 14720; 14726 BC |\n| Regular via Flood and Noah: 6 \u2192 1406 \u2192 2456 \u2192 3056 \u2192 4106 | 1400 + 1050 + 600 + 1050 | 4100 + 5010 + 600 + 5010 | 14720; 14726 BC |\n| Cumulative primary Flood path: 6 \u2192 1406 \u2192 4836 \u2192 14006 | 1400 + 3430 + 9170 | 4100 + 3430 + 7190 | 14720; 14726 BC |\n\nThe regular chronology remains the main focus. Noah's two-leg alternative reverses the order of 1050 and 1650, leaving their inverted sum unchanged. The finer 1050 + 600 + 1050 backbone also agrees because $I(1650)=5610=600+5010$. These are specific structural agreements, not a general additivity rule for digit reversal or extra independent target hits."
},
"Nativity_BC": 6,
"Creation_pillar_BC": 14726,
"Creation_pillar_status": "inherited derived endpoint, used only as a declared next-stage anchor",
"known_keys": {
"E": [
25,
23
],
"P": [
70,
69
],
"J": [
300,
299
]
},
"calendar_measures": {
"E": 336,
"P": 360,
"J": 364
},
"calibration_excerpt": {
"source": "Strategy",
"lines": [
109,
141
],
"text": "\nThe Style Guide already states the shared schematic year:\n\n\\[\nK=8400/23.\n\\]\n\nThe three exact identities are\n\n\\[\n336\\frac{25}{23}=360\\frac{70}{69}=364\\frac{300}{299}=K.\n\\]\n\nConsequently, at the scalar/calendar level,\n\n\\[\nK_d(s)=\\frac{K}{d}s,\\qquad d\\in\\{336,360,364\\},\n\\]\n\nand\n\n\\[\ndK_d(s)=Ks.\n\\]\n\nThe output year counts differ because their declared year lengths differ, while their modeled day-volume is the same. This supplies an existing mathematical reason for compatibility among the Keys.\n\nFor example, the `12558` seed gives `13650`, `12740`, and `12600` under the Priestly, Prophetic, and Enochian Keys, respectively:\n\n\\[\n13650\\times336=12740\\times360=12600\\times364=4586400.\n\\]\n"
},
"original_endpoint_pairs": [
{
"number": 1,
"Nativity": 1406,
"Conquest": 8606
},
{
"number": 2,
"Nativity": 7936,
"Conquest": 8926
},
{
"number": 3,
"Nativity": 7831,
"Conquest": 8821
},
{
"number": 4,
"Nativity": 8731,
"Conquest": 9721
},
{
"number": 5,
"Nativity": 1731,
"Conquest": 2721
},
{
"number": 6,
"Nativity": 4636,
"Conquest": 5626
},
{
"number": 7,
"Nativity": 8436,
"Conquest": 9426
},
{
"number": 8,
"Nativity": 2431,
"Conquest": 3421
},
{
"number": 9,
"Nativity": 3236,
"Conquest": 5216
},
{
"number": 10,
"Nativity": 5036,
"Conquest": 7016
},
{
"number": 11,
"Nativity": 5526,
"Conquest": 6516
},
{
"number": 12,
"Nativity": 5426,
"Conquest": 6416
},
{
"number": 13,
"Nativity": 2421,
"Conquest": 3411
},
{
"number": 14,
"Nativity": 9321,
"Conquest": 2391
},
{
"number": 15,
"Nativity": 5326,
"Conquest": 1996
},
{
"number": 16,
"Nativity": 2326,
"Conquest": 1696
},
{
"number": 17,
"Nativity": 9226,
"Conquest": 2386
},
{
"number": 18,
"Nativity": 6226,
"Conquest": 2086
},
{
"number": 19,
"Nativity": 3226,
"Conquest": 1786
},
{
"number": 20,
"Nativity": 6126,
"Conquest": 2076
},
{
"number": 21,
"Nativity": 6026,
"Conquest": 2066
},
{
"number": 22,
"Nativity": 2006,
"Conquest": 2006
},
{
"number": 23,
"Nativity": 1916,
"Conquest": 1556
},
{
"number": 24,
"Nativity": 3511,
"Conquest": 1711
},
{
"number": 25,
"Nativity": 2516,
"Conquest": 1616
},
{
"number": 26,
"Nativity": 7416,
"Conquest": 1476
},
{
"number": 27,
"Nativity": 7526,
"Conquest": 8516
},
{
"number": 28,
"Nativity": 9021,
"Conquest": 2361
},
{
"number": 29,
"Nativity": 7816,
"Conquest": 2146
},
{
"number": 30,
"Nativity": 4816,
"Conquest": 1846
},
{
"number": 31,
"Nativity": 4416,
"Conquest": 1446
},
{
"number": 32,
"Nativity": 2131,
"Conquest": 4111
}
],
"pair_source_locators": {
"Nativity": [
2161,
2192
],
"Conquest": [
2200,
2231
]
},
"inherited_cumulative_branches": {
"status": "derived in C940, not independent source primitives",
"one_pass_component_sums": [
10620,
11610
],
"original_total": 12600,
"register": "two three-digit cores, each exactly one trailing zero"
},
"nine_member_endpoint_literals": [
1731,
5526,
2421,
9321,
3226,
2076,
1616,
8516,
1846
],
"nine_member_locator": {
"section": "3.7.3",
"lines": [
519,
529
]
},
"guards": [
"No target enumeration or frequency tally",
"No new literal chronological route",
"No second decimal inversion",
"New P/J path images are conditional calibration comparisons",
"Common-pivot impossibility is a symbolic necessary-condition result, not a pivot search"
]
}
Evidence
inputs.json
Edition and provenance
inputs.json
SHA-256 e05037e8b8bd150e5e4130524cbe23cc7cf9f1e8522c5f9c15e463a9b828049f
C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/prep/interface_constraints/inputs.json