# C1086 — Manuscript: What retained parts let us recover

## Question

Does this section accurately connect its complete source family to the shared explanation?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "draft_sha256": "bd93d2b94670743de50bbb02707612fb204626861ade8309c51d4fc8ca5274f8",
  "module_index": 2
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "C1071",
  "prep/manuscript_keys.json"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:15:16.887117+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "section": {
    "path": "deliverables/sections/15_keys_3.md",
    "sha256": "3d927eaaa16146f1f4e7231aeafad2cc5effe8a61509a910a4f43ce48fc31a16",
    "bytes": 1721
  },
  "body_words": 191,
  "source_references": 2
}
```

## Finding

The retained-part section unifies the three flank rows and macro field with a rank-two measurement basis, correctly attributed to Supplement A.

## Reassessment

Reassess the next explanatory section against its source roles and the sealed calculations.

## Checks

```json
{
  "retained_macro": true,
  "source_attribution": true,
  "role_limit": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:15:16.887561+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `560ed33a4effd56fb469f8525d07a7bd8c7f210279fd2f22a955f378f98f9537`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`