# C1244 — Reconstruct the complete native LXX Moses path

## Question

Does the full native row chain agree with the projected two-block transfer?

## Inputs

```json
{}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "C1243",
  "model/complete_source_row_packet.json",
  "File51a §7A.5"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T05:42:13.702742+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "native_path": {
    "path": "model/Moses_LXX_native_complete_path.json",
    "sha256": "349e15040eb75bcb325bb2c83865a847266e0b60a265da53410dc040515fd403",
    "bytes": 3839
  },
  "nodes": 26,
  "head": 5486,
  "postFlood_partition": [
    660,
    1050
  ]
}
```

## Finding

The complete26-node nativeLXX path givesCreation5486 and3960 toMoses, with exactly oneCainan. Its660|1050 post-Flood partition matches the row-mask transfer.

## Reassessment

Compare the completeMT/LXX head difference with its pre/postFlood and insertion components.

## Checks

```json
{
  "head5486": true,
  "native_one": true,
  "blocks": true,
  "nodes26": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T05:42:13.706127+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `e8b4474dc6801fe86e85af21aeb387d4d985f8679c2a0d75ce1460b80e09c67e`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/journal.json`