# C1382 — Close the technical review corrections

## Question

Does final technical copy retain exact scope and clean formulas?

## Inputs

```json
{}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "draft/Technical_Companion_v2.md",
  "prep/technical_review_v1.json",
  "C1379"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T06:43:37.912446+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "companion": {
    "path": "draft/Technical_Companion_v3.md",
    "sha256": "74c2c4d9208219f98f7a08ebb89cd8222b300cfca646666cad2698a925d76e6d",
    "bytes": 18244
  },
  "resolution": {
    "path": "model/technical_review_resolution.json",
    "sha256": "c843c0bc5e51a1db12fd3856afa93c529cb7823108ba244032ea029c649b4db6",
    "bytes": 253
  }
}
```

## Finding

The technical companion now uses the exact Esau basis claim, separates NT metric from placement, states both integer cap inputs, and presents the residual formula cleanly.

## Reassessment

Close the main-reader review record.

## Checks

```json
{
  "six_resolutions": true,
  "metric": true,
  "specific_basis": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T06:43:37.913438+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `932f3995a71132f35466125374bf729edd66de5b12d3a5ef737490fa88d6a3e9`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/journal.json`