# Independent review of C792–C810

**Status: PASS, with two small wording clarifications for the final synthesis.** No mathematical, source-input, or scope defect requiring amendment of the recorded results was found. All19 scripts, their journal results, and the ten BJ model artifacts were read. No journal, script, model, or canonical source was edited.

The review independently recomputed the families from the frozen preparation packet and source rows rather than replaying the numbered scripts. A read-only check completed54 assertions: input-packet equality; six source hashes; all literal rows in18 source tables; the principal reconstructed results and two additional claim checks. These are verification assertions, not additional research steps, independent witnesses, or statistical evidence. The initial temporary command contained a syntax typo before execution; the corrected read-only command completed successfully.

## Source binding

`model/jubilees_inputs.json` is identical to the frozen `prep/jubilees_packet.json`. All six current source hashes match that packet. Every one of its90 table rows matches the exact source line indicated in its locator. This covers source fidelity for the packet; it does not independently authenticate ancient manuscript readings.

Principal controllers checked:

- File53 §2, lines192–213: all22 works, day classes, and corresponding head labels.
- File53 §3A.1–4, especially lines291–296 and340–347: the chronological deletion table and the separately declared mixed comparison object.
- File20 §§7A2.1–5, lines889–957, and File53 §13A, lines979–982: surface timestamps, stated ages, and distinct reconstructed spine.
- File20 §8.1, lines1182–1184, and§8.6, lines1227–1230: sacrifice/death dates and the115|60|115 partition.
- File20 §7A.10, lines1135–1164: inherited early begetting inputs, both460 bookends, their translation, and designated-component expansion.
- File43 §§2–4, especially lines525–541,592–627,766–767: the names-span, interval, birth-head, and envelope-head roles.

## Findings by family

| Steps | Review result | Source/claim qualification |
|---|---|---|
| C792–C793 | All22 rows and their day-block counts7|1|4|3|3|4 agree. The twelve-name prefix is fixed and ten-name suffix shifts by one when Kainan is retained at13. | The patriarch/work parallel remains File53 structural inference. C793 does not claim to have executed the optional Levi–Moses extension. |
| C794–C795 | Original3856→2549→2482→2425 has1307|67|57. Holding Shelah while removing57 yields3799→2492→2425 with1307|67. Count1, BJ57, regular130, and cumulative460 remain explicitly distinct weights. | The expunged chronology is secondary reconstruction. No BJ Kainan lifespan or BJ cumulative460 is invented. Native LXX is not given a second Cainan. |
| C796 | Both2450 trunks, compressed2400, and the two2393 diagnostics are correct. Net50=57−7 accounts for the change of start role. | This is role-sensitive composition, not a free57→50 conversion or evidence of general BJ rounding. |
| C797–C798 | The four comparison positions3149,2649,2549,2049 close underx→5198−x. Substituting2492 alone leaves missing mirrors2549 and2706 exactly as recorded. | Closure belongs to the source’s mixed comparison object: original displayed internal positions measured against compressedCreation3799 and rest1399. It is not symmetry of the expunged chronology. |
| C799–C800 | AM residuals0|11|10|5 and edge changes+11|−1|−5 are correct; BC conversion3857−AM gives both complete date vectors. | Surface59 versus source prose70 remains visible. The source’s historical/editorial explanation has not been proven. |
| C801 | The full reconstructed100|60|130|285 and surface111|59|125|280 both sum575. Their differences11|−1|−5|−5 sum0. | The fixed outer span is retained while internal boundaries move. Selecting280 alone does not determine the earlier surface choices. |
| C802 | Both entry→death spans are17; generated reconstruction death2183AM/1674BC and surface2188AM differ5. Surface birth→death is142 against stated147. | The reconstructed death is correctly named generated. The preserved final17 does not resolve the conflicting lifespan. |
| C803–C804 | Six ordered coordinates1981,1881,1866,1821,1806,1691 have gaps100|15|45|15|115. The two cut maps give100|60|130 and115|60|115 exactly. | The source supplies these as part of its reconstructed chronology and associated sacrifice/death display. They are not all transmitted surface-ledger dates. |
| C805 | All six source tuples regenerate AM461,1806,1876,1987,2046,2188 and their BC labels under49(j−1)+7(w−1)+y. | Macro50 counts jubilees in50×49; it does not change the49-year unit. The50-unit substitution fails for all six tuples, a stronger fact than the script’s required “any fails” check. |
| C806–C807 | The complete bookend path is460|1490|460|40. Both corresponding endpoint gaps are1950. E(460)=500 reaches1406 from held1906; retaining prefix1950 yields2450. Whole E(2410)=60250/23 differs. | The early460 is explicitly SP-derived. Expansion acts on the designated tail; co-registration with Conquest does not turn the original Exodus event into Conquest. |
| C808–C809 | Luke head5326 minus Matthew envelope2876 is2450=35×70=50×49. Substituting birth-head2806 gives2520. | This is a duration interface with required head roles, not event identity, transfer of BJ’s22-head index, or proof of literary dependence. |
| C810 | Its seven-family ledger accurately summarizes the recovered operations and leaves source choices unexplained. | One wording correction below: six nodes contain only four internal boundaries. |

## Additional claim checks

C799’s statement that one translation or scale cannot carry the full biological path to the surface path is correct. Translation would require constant residuals. Since Abraham is fixed, any affine candidate must fix that point; the three required elapsed-time slopes are111/100,17/16,59/58, which are unequal. This review supplies the explicit check absent from C799’s two named assertions. No record rewrite is needed.

The inherited SP relation remains intact. C794 treats1307 as inherited source structure; C806 expressly identifies the early begetting chain as SP-derived. The final explanation should state the inherited7+1300 once so readers do not interpret the sameBJ span as independent support. No upstream Gear motion, primer, second decimal inversion, or remote SKL extension occurs in these scripts.

The reflection’s implied Shem2649/2049 labels remain local comparison positions. They must not replace the controlled sourceShem2650 and derived2050 terminal. Neither C797 nor C798 performs that substitution. Similarly, the generated center2599 is useful geometry and carries no historical-event appointment.

## Small wording clarifications for downstream synthesis

1. C810’s model-ledger cell says “six source-labelled inner boundaries.” The refined path has **six supplied nodes, including four internal nodes and two endpoints**. Use that wording in the final explanation. This is a counting-label issue; the six coordinates, five intervals, and both coarsenings are correct.
2. C803’s artifact accurately says all six coordinates occur in the project source. In user-facing prose identify the object as the **source’s reconstructed biological/sacrifice path** so “supplied” is not read as “all directly transmitted surface dates.” C799–C802 already make this distinction; it should follow the refinement into the synthesis.

Neither clarification changes a calculated result. The earlier journals and models were left unchanged as instructed.

## Review conclusion

The strongest contribution is the transfer of the same rule to a second kind of source disagreement: local changes redistribute a fixed575-year body, while the final17-year interval translates intact. The290 common refinement and the designated460 expansion then connect BJ to the retained-path operations already used for Actual/Rounded and calendar families. The numbered work keeps source weights, index changes, reconstructed dates, and surface dates distinct while doing so.