# C1100 — Manuscript: Keeping occurrence counts when sections are grouped

## Question

Does this section accurately connect its complete source family to the shared explanation?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "draft_sha256": "425439295d487b1988f0790bd3399079d0c5bcb8b87535b8f77d3761aee346f6",
  "module_index": 4
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "C1071",
  "prep/manuscript_structural.json"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:16:49.732205+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "section": {
    "path": "deliverables/sections/29_structural_5.md",
    "sha256": "79bb1c97ff67c9d9c64b770992be06097845865b849804fbbee5fcf1be966efc",
    "bytes": 1516
  },
  "body_words": 212,
  "source_references": 1
}
```

## Finding

The Toledot section preserves both legitimate counting measures and states why multiplicity restores occurrence balance without restoring quotient reflection.

## Reassessment

Reassess the next explanatory section against its source roles and the sealed calculations.

## Checks

```json
{
  "count": true,
  "center_scope": true,
  "reflection_limit": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:16:49.732599+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `e0dfdbd316b074533280395d78dccf3dad1932695b13344b6823eb30157778af`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`