# C763 — Separate SP rounding from terminal branch selection

## Question

Can the Strategy13406 head be reconstructed by explicit typed increments?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "SP_lower_actual": 13396,
  "Moses_center": 13398,
  "rounded_Moses": 13401,
  "rounded_Aaron_increment": 5
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "File51a §16.2 Aaron variant; Strategy cumulative SP/J rectangle; C757"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T01:56:44.219720+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "chain": [
    13396,
    13398,
    13401,
    13406
  ],
  "increments": [
    2,
    3,
    5
  ],
  "status": "conditional cross-tradition application of the source rounding/branch rules",
  "distinction": "rounded Aaron125-minus-Moses120 is not exact Actual Tishri phase+3.5"
}
```

## Finding

The Strategy head13406 has a transparent conditional reconstruction: +2 endpoint selection, +3 SP row-rounding residual, +5 rounded Aaron branch. The arithmetic explains the supplied+10 without proving that derivation was intended.

## Reassessment

Check the complete SP/J rectangle with this head and label its generated status.

## Checks

```json
{
  "decomposition": true,
  "branch": true,
  "total": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T01:56:44.220329+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `b897753ebcc8c78e32f8324286bccae8ac5d49efd0f769fc6d71723814e7334d`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json`