# C1116 — Bind the explanatory claims to source copies

## Question

Can readers trace all five main argument blocks to supplied sources and completed calculations?

## Inputs

```json
{}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "evidence/SOURCE_MANIFEST.json",
  "deliverables/review/Integrated_Draft_v2.md"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:32:58.504208+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "reader_index": {
    "path": "deliverables/Source_Claim_Index_C1131.md",
    "sha256": "591582a78cee5493f87863d1b8a70b0282f6fb01d6b64eafc2679f254c34281c",
    "bytes": 1995
  },
  "bound_claims": {
    "path": "model/source_claim_index.json",
    "sha256": "ae5715baa5a354d05b55c0dc7cfad431a7f06c55bc4a7e805def40b605f745da",
    "bytes": 3522
  },
  "source_counts": [
    3,
    1,
    4,
    3,
    4
  ]
}
```

## Finding

The five argument blocks now have explicit source-copy bindings alongside the existing thirty section-level locators. The two corrected source attributions are retained.

## Reassessment

Consolidate the independent calculation and integration reviews before final editing.

## Checks

```json
{
  "all_groups_nonempty": true,
  "five_groups": true,
  "latest52c": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:32:58.505079+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `3bf97a8f754ed09479dcb0c9d08dd5a774d55eaa5d0e82f5a7b6fd17d9ca5018`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`