# C1469 — Reconcile independent algebra and source reviews

## Question

Do independently checked partitions, source states and novelty classifications agree with the cycle results?

## Sources

```json
[
  "Independent structure review",
  "Independent source review",
  "Independent Key review"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-29T01:20:57.313277+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "partition_review": {
    "status": "PASS",
    "checks": 41
  },
  "Key_review": {
    "status": "pass",
    "checks": 34
  },
  "source_findings": [
    "Latest full File52c and C1432 snapshot identical",
    "Attached short File52c retained as older source record",
    "MT Regular partitions and MT cumulative refined13016 inherited",
    "Systematic LXX/SP named600 comparison extends inspected sources",
    "LXX3836/3336 bound to complete native Rounded model",
    "SP source nodes use admitted Flood+600, no new Gear or sojourn operation"
  ],
  "promoted": [
    "complementary refinement responses",
    "SP selected upper-branch translations",
    "Shem coordinate incidences with role tags",
    "closed source-named Key circuit"
  ],
  "recording_note": "Reviewer statuses normalized case-insensitively (PASS/pass); no arithmetic check failed."
}
```

## Finding

Independent arithmetic and source reviews support the comparative extension; inherited MT results are marked explicitly and selected branches retain their source roles.

## Reassessment

Write the integrated explanation around the strongest results, with exact alternative heads retained in the research evidence.

## Checks

```json
{
  "partition_review_pass": true,
  "Key_review_pass": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-29T01:22:32.698426+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `8f17f0e638118479e41cfe67047e938d15140f59a2cf267f0a7d4f146468ba46`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C1433_C1482/journal.json`