# C617 — Reconcile review clarifications

## Question

Which changes improve the explanatory account without rewriting completed research records?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "reviewed_ranges": "C532–C612; conceptual artifact review in progress"
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "Independent review notes in evidence/"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T00:32:40.728951+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "clarifications": 11,
  "artifact": {
    "path": "evidence/REVIEW_RECONCILIATION.json",
    "sha256": "c99964387bdc13282a220992516c365613b0326136017630ba704c4f58e4d264",
    "bytes": 1644
  },
  "numeric_corrections": 0
}
```

## Finding

Reviews require no arithmetic correction through C612. Eleven explicit presentation/source clarifications are carried into the final synthesis, including the Enochian Key name and the missing lifespan premise.

## Reassessment

Write the integrated explanatory draft with these corrections and the new interfaces.

## Checks

```json
{
  "recorded": true,
  "terminology": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T00:32:40.729407+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `83aefc8c7d5dbd78def50de4b40ad98f3d666ee91f760d7fea5fe192e995f2cb`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0532_C0631/journal.json`