{
  "status": "Question register written before the new calculations below; preparation only, not numbered root actions.",
  "scope": "Whole-family source constraints and identifiability in File58 lists, File43/54 NT display, and File70 literary occurrence/section domains. Prior fitted families remain prior fitted families.",
  "questions": [
    {"id":"ST01","question":"Do the existing clean ordered walk and female cumulative register together determine all nine Esau printed counts once the printed grand total is supplied?","new_over":"C845 considered marginal rank; C846 and C847 considered separate paths. Joint measurement reconstruction is untested."},
    {"id":"ST02","question":"Which precise counts remain invisible if the grand total is omitted from that combined register?","new_over":"Characterize the surviving joint kernel rather than repeat the marginal-only kernel."},
    {"id":"ST03","question":"Which source-published clean/female measurements form a minimal exact basis for the nine counts, and does that basis reconstruct by integer arithmetic?","new_over":"Determine a nonredundant whole-source measurement basis."},
    {"id":"ST04","question":"Can one complete clean walk plus the unclean framing walk reconstruct the nine counts with no sex/purity marginal input?","new_over":"The unclean three-step path of File58 §13.4 has not been part of the full-joint reconstruction."},
    {"id":"ST05","question":"Which equalities connect the separately declared clean, female and unclean registers, and which recorded landings are dependent consequences?","new_over":"Cross-register incidence relations, not another endpoint inventory."},
    {"id":"ST06","question":"How much of the source head remains identifiable if only path gaps rather than absolute landings are retained?","new_over":"Separate count reconstruction from common translation gauge in a complete list."},
    {"id":"ST07","question":"Can the Tishri species totals and the explicit source row-template constraints jointly determine all seven category rows?","new_over":"C836 demonstrated margins alone are insufficient; test the additional source predicates, not margins again."},
    {"id":"ST08","question":"Which template constraint is essential to determining that complete Tishri ledger?","new_over":"Independent support-restricted ambiguity analysis."},
    {"id":"ST09","question":"Does the full Sukkot descending-bull rule follow from total70 and constant decrement1, and what exact input count does this reduce?","new_over":"C834 used daily counts to reconstruct the matrix; invert the source-defined sequence constraints with no new calendar assumption."},
    {"id":"ST10","question":"Under the source's fixed species support, can festival scale7 and anchor1859 be recovered from two predeclared chronological landings, and do all other source landings then follow?","new_over":"Conditional identifiability of the existing scale/placement, not selection of new target dates."},
    {"id":"ST11","question":"Which additional published landing can diagnose incorrect order when scale and anchor are fitted from the same two declared landings?","new_over":"Use an internally redundant complete source field to distinguish order; no holdout claim."},
    {"id":"ST12","question":"Do the source's Enoch→Jared one-slot and Enoch→Adam six-slot Key returns impose one independent index constraint or two?","new_over":"C866–867 classified return domains; this asks the rank and dependence of the source-marked knot conditions."},
    {"id":"ST13","question":"What metric freedom remains after those two marked Key-knot constraints are imposed?","new_over":"Separate dimensionless index selection from the independent 70-year unit."},
    {"id":"ST14","question":"Can the already declared BJ Creation–Conquest span and its35-slot NT separation determine the metric unit, and which source placement is still needed?","new_over":"Conditional reconstruction of unit from marked whole-family incidence; prior2450 arithmetic remains inherited."},
    {"id":"ST15","question":"Do the complete marked NT constraints reconstruct the primary display from unit, anchor and list order with any fewer independent numeric premises?","new_over":"Rank audit of a proposed reduced primitive packet, not another row regeneration."},
    {"id":"ST16","question":"If the names-span bookend is omitted, which marked chiasm/reflection statements survive as interval claims and which acquire unequal outer arms?","new_over":"Explicit source-role sensitivity across the complete primary object."},
    {"id":"ST17","question":"Does the finite NT reflection induce a well-defined action on named equivalence classes such as repeated name tokens?","new_over":"Checks whether numerical grid symmetry preserves the source label structure; identical tokens do not automatically mean identical persons."},
    {"id":"ST18","question":"What is the exact source quotient from eleven toledot formula occurrences to ten major sections?","new_over":"File70 literary occurrence topology, not prior chronological rail or phase fields."},
    {"id":"ST19","question":"Does the occurrence reflection fixing Terah descend to that major-section quotient?","new_over":"Test quotient compatibility of the full literary index symmetry."},
    {"id":"ST20","question":"Which information restores the occurrence midpoint after section contraction: an occurrence multiplicity weight, a shifted center, or a new grouping?","new_over":"Identify minimal retained source information; no new textual grouping is authorized."},
    {"id":"ST21","question":"What is the smallest reflection-stable equivalence closure of the source Esau duplicate class, and why is it only a formal diagnostic?","new_over":"An exact obstruction and conditional completion for the supplied quotient; no historical regrouping claim."},
    {"id":"ST22","question":"Can the literary first–middle–last relation be stated simultaneously in unweighted section rank and weighted occurrence count without conflating them?","new_over":"A complete two-measure explanation of the declared literary spine."},
    {"id":"ST23","question":"What common condition allows a source aggregation or contraction to carry an existing reflection, as illustrated independently by toledot and the NT common490 coarsening?","new_over":"Generalize two complete-object witnesses to a compatibility criterion, without new endpoint sampling."},
    {"id":"ST24","question":"Which source constraints in these reconstructions are independent data, which are derived from the same counts, and which merely replace one full-rank parameterization with another?","new_over":"Final input-reduction audit; avoid declaring descriptive compression to be historical generation."}
  ],
  "exclusions": ["second decimal inversion","primer hypotheses","upstream Gear transport","remote SKL extensions","new statistical tally","untouched holdout claims"]
}