# C926 — Accept the final independent text disposition

## Question

Are the final reading versions consistent with source roles and verified fields?

## Inputs

```json
{}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "REVIEW_FINAL_TEXT_PREFLIGHT"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T03:06:27.811537+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "acceptance": {
    "path": "evidence/FINAL_TEXT_ACCEPTANCE_C926.json",
    "sha256": "ba6801b6331eac1ac58fc4e7dd73cd7bfff11d0827e1f1d7d30591cb92cfa7dc",
    "bytes": 1764
  },
  "checks": 12,
  "bound_reading_files": 5
}
```

## Finding

The independently reviewed final synthesis, companion, guide and map are accepted at their exact current hashes. All identified prose issues are resolved, with no numerical model changes.

## Reassessment

Write the final continuity checkpoint and next unused action number.

## Checks

```json
{
  "PASS": true,
  "checks": true,
  "five_files": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T03:06:27.813476+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `74a92b69ac25156d10aa687aa6309312c09bdda23aa15e9a2ae5a07167fba75c`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0832_C0931/journal.json`