# C483 — Weighted-anchor transfer

## Question

Do the supplied actual completion pairs preserve the C481 weighted anchor?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "MT": [
    14004,
    4114
  ],
  "LXX_native_ON": [
    14894,
    5494
  ],
  "SP_equalized_OFF": [
    13396,
    4414
  ]
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "File18 §§6B–6D",
  "File22 §5.1",
  "File52c §3.14"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-27T22:37:52.573459+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "MT": {
    "weighted_point": 12026,
    "difference_from_12026": 0,
    "residual_4C_plus_R_minus_5A": 0
  },
  "LXX_native_ON": {
    "weighted_point": 13014,
    "difference_from_12026": 988,
    "residual_4C_plus_R_minus_5A": 4940
  },
  "SP_equalized_OFF": {
    "weighted_point": "57998/5",
    "difference_from_12026": "-2132/5",
    "residual_4C_plus_R_minus_5A": -2132
  }
}
```

## Finding

The 1:4 weighted operation transfers, but its value does not: LXX gives 13014 and SP gives 11599.6. The MT anchor is a particular input-dependent placement, not a universal cross-tradition constant.

## Reassessment

Explain the failures through the actual regular/cumulative source differences rather than fit new anchors.

## Checks

```json
{
  "MT": true,
  "LXX": true,
  "SP": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-27T22:37:52.573685+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `2d8648e433b1c5b5e236b77fae7662d91e5431ed83423f0be5710a5700868c5d`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0482_C0531/journal.json`