from research import *
s=begin(644,'Recover the Enoch partition of the Priestly minimum','What additional placement does the appendix’s supplied Enoch close contribute?',{'path':[4237,3257,1885],'Enoch_status':'pre-existing secondary source comparison; no Gear transport'},['File70 Appendix D.2–D.4'])
parts=[4237-3257,3257-1885]
finish(s,{'partition':parts,'jubilee49_coefficients':[F(x,49) for x in parts],'primitive196_coefficients':[F(x,196) for x in parts],'whole':sum(parts)},'The supplied Enoch close partitions2352 as980+1372, or20+28 jubilee49 units. The reduced ratio is5:7. The total follows from the rail geometry; this particular internal cut depends on the separately supplied3257 role.','Test the corresponding Enoch head to identify which part of the partition is role-specific.',{'partition':parts==[980,1372],'total':sum(parts)==2352,'ratio':F(parts[0],parts[1])==F(5,7)})
