# C1585 — Choose source-generated connections over another endpoint scan

## Question

Which fixed objects and operations can explain the new Flood and Abram endpoints without widening the mirror study?

## Sources

```json
[
  "Strategy §§1,5B–F,6–9",
  "Reader_before.md",
  "author instruction"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-29T14:52:55.286438+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "MSS": [
    "MT",
    "LXX",
    "SP"
  ],
  "modes": [
    "Regular",
    "Cumulative"
  ],
  "anchors_BC": [
    1406,
    6
  ],
  "source_targets": [
    "536 BC",
    "1446 BC",
    "1406 BC",
    "AD 65"
  ],
  "Rounded_endpoint": "AD 2166",
  "permitted": [
    "one-pass reversal of original legs",
    "ordered reconstruction",
    "translation of named node packets",
    "exact anchored Keys already admitted"
  ],
  "deferred": [
    "second decimal reversal",
    "deeper mirror study",
    "Gear transport to Creation"
  ],
  "status": "synthesis of known source information; not a holdout"
}
```

## Finding

The new task is a comparison of named paths and source differences. The three supplied spans are fixed targets for explanation, not results of a new search.

## Reassessment

Start with the inherited post-Flood rows: they may explain the 910 and 120 differences entering the inverse Floods.

## Checks

```json
{}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-29T14:52:55.287583+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `7fe061a6a27fca7bcf1f753fb5120b6f9dccefcb6cf156aa08396679db8fb804`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C1585_C1634/journal.json`