[
  {
    "step": 1433,
    "title": "Set the comparative spine question",
    "question": "Which source-controlled internal relations extend the six inverse trunks beyond their known head equalities?",
    "sources": [
      "Research Strategy §§1,5–7",
      "C1432"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:12.995911+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "35a79546d770dd1772c585633229c77158fa94cd3fff426e2186a8b7eb6fc319",
    "results": {
      "objects": "MT/LXX/SP Regular and Cumulative spines",
      "allowed": "single reversal of original named-node intervals; source translations; admitted anchored Keys",
      "excluded": "second decimal reversal; arbitrary fitted pivots; new Gear or sojourn variants"
    },
    "finding": "Use named Noah/Shem partitions and source-derived connections to test how far the common construction extends.",
    "reassessment": "Resolve the source editions before reconstructing the six objects.",
    "checks": {},
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:12.996210+00:00",
    "sha256": "caa65fd194911d2ea5d37f1f56326312fa22cbbe7d24f65ad5b02d7a935ca6a9"
  },
  {
    "step": 1434,
    "title": "Resolve and freeze controlling sources",
    "question": "Does the attached short File52c supersede the full edition already used, and which document controls LXX/SP?",
    "sources": [
      "File52c attached and full editions",
      "September28 comparative study"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:12.996554+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "caa65fd194911d2ea5d37f1f56326312fa22cbbe7d24f65ad5b02d7a935ca6a9",
    "results": {
      "full_File52c_matches_C1432": true,
      "full_lines": 3181,
      "attached_lines": 1673
    },
    "finding": "The full File52c remains the MT control; the September28 comparative study controls the native LXX and accepted SP Fall paths.",
    "reassessment": "Register exactly those six source pairs, keeping the source heads and pivots explicit.",
    "checks": {
      "full_edition_unchanged": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:13.002357+00:00",
    "sha256": "15ddb61a6d86630375f54e6ce1e9b692c0b1fb4a0c7520674c17bb8c265232a5"
  },
  {
    "step": 1435,
    "title": "Register the six declared source pairs",
    "question": "What are the complete source and one-pass paths for each manuscript and mode?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study §2"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:13.003212+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "15ddb61a6d86630375f54e6ce1e9b692c0b1fb4a0c7520674c17bb8c265232a5",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "C": 4106,
        "F": 2456,
        "hinge_role": "Noah",
        "legs": [
          1050,
          1650
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          6416,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          9116,
          14726
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Creation"
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "C": 14006,
        "F": 4836,
        "hinge_role": "Shem",
        "legs": [
          3430,
          9170
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4836,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7536,
          14726
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Creation"
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "C": 5486,
        "F": 3236,
        "hinge_role": "Noah",
        "legs": [
          1830,
          2250
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5216,
          10436
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7916,
          13136
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Creation"
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "C": 14896,
        "F": 5746,
        "hinge_role": "Shem",
        "legs": [
          4340,
          9150
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5746,
          10936
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          8446,
          13636
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Creation"
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "C": 4406,
        "F": 3106,
        "hinge_role": "Noah",
        "legs": [
          1700,
          1300
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          8506,
          11606
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          11206,
          14306
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Fall"
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "C": 13396,
        "F": 4716,
        "hinge_role": "Shem",
        "legs": [
          3310,
          8680
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          2736,
          11416
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          5436,
          14116
        ],
        "source_head_role": "Fall"
      }
    },
    "finding": "The six objects use one reconstruction rule with distinct original intervals and source roles.",
    "reassessment": "Compare against the inherited results and identify what is already explained.",
    "checks": {
      "all_segments_positive": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:12:13.003846+00:00",
    "sha256": "d7705a369530967f8d2e79f348d69e679bcf165c22306dddd9f79bbae583c4e8"
  },
  {
    "step": 1436,
    "title": "Separate inherited results from the new question",
    "question": "Which relationships are established before this cycle?",
    "sources": [
      "Reader before, inverse spine section",
      "C1432"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.452924+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "d7705a369530967f8d2e79f348d69e679bcf165c22306dddd9f79bbae583c4e8",
    "results": {
      "existing": [
        "six primary spine paths",
        "mode differences0/500/−190",
        "cumulative contractions−1980/−3960/−1980",
        "SP translations9900/9890 and LXX13306 link",
        "C1432 Covenant head map and11270 translations"
      ],
      "extension_question": "named Noah/Shem partitions and retained intermediate nodes"
    },
    "finding": "Primary heads and C1432 remain inherited results; this cycle tests their internal extent and explains their connections.",
    "reassessment": "Use the shared tail to reduce duplicate work across anchor stages.",
    "checks": {
      "MT_regular": true,
      "MT_cumulative": true,
      "LXX_regular": true,
      "LXX_cumulative": true,
      "SP_regular": true,
      "SP_cumulative": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.453296+00:00",
    "sha256": "4dcb46f9bbb7fd4e5f80cb6be52812dd7f8e5958feabe1c22b23b9c3855b6064"
  },
  {
    "step": 1437,
    "title": "Derive the universal stage translation",
    "question": "Does adding the original Nativity leg act uniformly on every complete spine?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study §2.2"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.454346+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4dcb46f9bbb7fd4e5f80cb6be52812dd7f8e5958feabe1c22b23b9c3855b6064",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "tail_gain": 2700,
        "head_difference": 2700,
        "interior_suffix_difference": [
          2700,
          2700,
          2700
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "Adding the reversed 1400 tail translates the reconstructed Conquest-and-earlier suffix by2700 for all six objects.",
    "reassessment": "Analyze mode differences at one stage; the second stage follows from this common translation.",
    "checks": {
      "every_suffix_translates": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.454790+00:00",
    "sha256": "993322e8bf2c5215bc6535fe6eddcbffe5b0d9c0db3b757bed41272d9a2ac0e1"
  },
  {
    "step": 1438,
    "title": "Reconstruct MT convergence at component level",
    "question": "What compensates when MT switches from Regular to Cumulative source measurement?",
    "sources": [
      "File52c §3.3–3.4"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.455583+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "993322e8bf2c5215bc6535fe6eddcbffe5b0d9c0db3b757bed41272d9a2ac0e1",
    "results": {
      "source_mode_gap": 9900,
      "reversed_component_differences": [
        -1580,
        1580
      ],
      "head_gap": 0,
      "gain_regular": 7920,
      "gain_cumulative": -1980
    },
    "finding": "MT switches between source measurements differing9900, but its reversed component changes−1580 and+1580 cancel.",
    "reassessment": "Test whether the LXX divergence has the same local compensation structure.",
    "checks": {
      "exact_compensation": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.455789+00:00",
    "sha256": "8220a0317f23789687cf14ad36dfda0d979f3e7f888cacc8e45ea27d9eeebb11"
  },
  {
    "step": 1439,
    "title": "Reconstruct LXX residual at component level",
    "question": "Which component prevents LXX Regular/Cumulative convergence?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study §3"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.456564+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "8220a0317f23789687cf14ad36dfda0d979f3e7f888cacc8e45ea27d9eeebb11",
    "results": {
      "source_mode_gap": 9410,
      "reversed_component_differences": [
        530,
        -30
      ],
      "head_gap": 500,
      "gain_regular": 4950,
      "gain_cumulative": -3960
    },
    "finding": "The LXX lower-leg difference530 is only offset by30 in the upper leg, leaving the known500-year residual.",
    "reassessment": "Test the accepted SP state without changing its Fall choice.",
    "checks": {
      "residual500": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.456689+00:00",
    "sha256": "13307a5f832b1e7940c65524ab8946167c6a9d34c79a70e0487b961856104bda"
  },
  {
    "step": 1440,
    "title": "Reconstruct SP residual at component level",
    "question": "What causes the accepted SP cumulative head to fall190 years later than its regular head?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study §7"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.457296+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "13307a5f832b1e7940c65524ab8946167c6a9d34c79a70e0487b961856104bda",
    "results": {
      "source_mode_gap": 8990,
      "reversed_component_differences": [
        -5770,
        5580
      ],
      "head_gap": -190,
      "gain_regular": 7200,
      "gain_cumulative": -1980
    },
    "finding": "SP cumulative/regular mode changes−5770 and+5580 leave−190, under the same accepted Fall convention in both modes.",
    "reassessment": "Explain why these changes lie in different decimal registers before testing new partitions.",
    "checks": {
      "residual_minus190": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:03.457505+00:00",
    "sha256": "17cb6d26ca472ad5120e83d9c04946f0269e6bd8c5dae4f07de59b69491538f9"
  },
  {
    "step": 1441,
    "title": "Explain gains by decimal register",
    "question": "Can the signed reversal gains be computed from the source digits without treating them as unrelated constants?",
    "sources": [
      "File52c decimal operation",
      "Six registered source spines"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.070184+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "17cb6d26ca472ad5120e83d9c04946f0269e6bd8c5dae4f07de59b69491538f9",
    "results": [
      {
        "spine": "MT_regular",
        "n": 1050,
        "I_n": 5010,
        "core": "105",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 3960,
        "formula_gain": 3960
      },
      {
        "spine": "MT_regular",
        "n": 1650,
        "I_n": 5610,
        "core": "165",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 3960,
        "formula_gain": 3960
      },
      {
        "spine": "MT_cumulative",
        "n": 3430,
        "I_n": 3430,
        "core": "343",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 0,
        "formula_gain": 0
      },
      {
        "spine": "MT_cumulative",
        "n": 9170,
        "I_n": 7190,
        "core": "917",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": -1980,
        "formula_gain": -1980
      },
      {
        "spine": "LXX_regular",
        "n": 1830,
        "I_n": 3810,
        "core": "183",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 1980,
        "formula_gain": 1980
      },
      {
        "spine": "LXX_regular",
        "n": 2250,
        "I_n": 5220,
        "core": "225",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 2970,
        "formula_gain": 2970
      },
      {
        "spine": "LXX_cumulative",
        "n": 4340,
        "I_n": 4340,
        "core": "434",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 0,
        "formula_gain": 0
      },
      {
        "spine": "LXX_cumulative",
        "n": 9150,
        "I_n": 5190,
        "core": "915",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": -3960,
        "formula_gain": -3960
      },
      {
        "spine": "SP_regular",
        "n": 1700,
        "I_n": 7100,
        "core": "17",
        "zeros": 2,
        "gain": 5400,
        "formula_gain": 5400
      },
      {
        "spine": "SP_regular",
        "n": 1300,
        "I_n": 3100,
        "core": "13",
        "zeros": 2,
        "gain": 1800,
        "formula_gain": 1800
      },
      {
        "spine": "SP_cumulative",
        "n": 3310,
        "I_n": 1330,
        "core": "331",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": -1980,
        "formula_gain": -1980
      },
      {
        "spine": "SP_cumulative",
        "n": 8680,
        "I_n": 8680,
        "core": "868",
        "zeros": 1,
        "gain": 0,
        "formula_gain": 0
      }
    ],
    "finding": "For abc0 spans the gain is990(c−a); for SP regular ab00 spans it is900(b−a). Source digits account for the six signed gains.",
    "reassessment": "Use these register laws to distinguish forced residues from exact cancellations.",
    "checks": {
      "all_twelve_legs_explained": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.070815+00:00",
    "sha256": "b2685555226504831a03c145f8b1eb7b80b45857db9192bd4a5a7d32a704d513"
  },
  {
    "step": 1442,
    "title": "Locate the obstruction to cross-mode coincidence",
    "question": "Are LXX/SP nonzero head differences avoidable without altering their declared source states?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered source mode gaps",
      "Decimal gain laws"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.072488+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "b2685555226504831a03c145f8b1eb7b80b45857db9192bd4a5a7d32a704d513",
    "results": {
      "MT": {
        "source_gap": 9900,
        "head_gap": 0,
        "modulus": 990,
        "residue": 0,
        "same_residue": true
      },
      "LXX": {
        "source_gap": 9410,
        "head_gap": 500,
        "modulus": 990,
        "residue": 500,
        "same_residue": true
      },
      "SP": {
        "source_gap": 8990,
        "head_gap": -190,
        "modulus": 90,
        "residue": 80,
        "same_residue": true
      }
    },
    "finding": "MT and LXX primary spans preserve gaps modulo990; LXX residue500 prevents convergence. Across SP digit widths the safe common modulus90 leaves residue80, also preventing convergence.",
    "reassessment": "The next test should change only source-named partitions, not tune inputs toward convergence.",
    "checks": {
      "all_congruences": true,
      "LXX_residue": true,
      "SP_residue": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.072973+00:00",
    "sha256": "27cc30a3a28136cc09e0f2bd013e3b270d528c6144fa0b0b1da65f669f63ec56"
  },
  {
    "step": 1443,
    "title": "Bind the named600-year hinge in both modes",
    "question": "Which additional internal node can be used consistently in all six source paths?",
    "sources": [
      "File51a MT Noah and Shem rows",
      "Comparative Study §4.1 LXX Shem",
      "File53 SP cumulative envelopes"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.074026+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "27cc30a3a28136cc09e0f2bd013e3b270d528c6144fa0b0b1da65f669f63ec56",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "F": 2456,
        "hinge": 3056,
        "role": "Noah",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "F": 4836,
        "hinge": 5436,
        "role": "Shem",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "F": 3236,
        "hinge": 3836,
        "role": "Noah",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "F": 5746,
        "hinge": 6346,
        "role": "Shem",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "F": 3106,
        "hinge": 3706,
        "role": "Noah",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "F": 4716,
        "hinge": 5316,
        "role": "Shem",
        "span": 600,
        "construction": "same rounded source state; no new Gear transport"
      }
    },
    "finding": "Regular uses Noah birth600 before Flood; Cumulative uses the Shem lifespan boundary600 before Flood. These are separate role-tagged source paths.",
    "reassessment": "Test MT Regular Flood-only, Noah-only and both-node partitions first, retaining the same endpoints.",
    "checks": {
      "hinges_inside_all_paths": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:13:46.075327+00:00",
    "sha256": "12c70e44c1a378fdc6d2dbc2f9faf54543c1548aa0857920a0b015f13da5978f"
  },
  {
    "step": 1444,
    "title": "Test MT_regular at Noah and Flood",
    "question": "Do the two named coarse partitions and the path retaining both source nodes have the same inverse head?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered MT_regular source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.268394+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "12c70e44c1a378fdc6d2dbc2f9faf54543c1548aa0857920a0b015f13da5978f",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          1050,
          1650
        ],
        "images": [
          5010,
          5610
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          6416,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          9116,
          14726
        ]
      },
      "Noah": {
        "source_legs": [
          1650,
          1050
        ],
        "images": [
          5610,
          5010
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          7016,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          9716,
          14726
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          1050,
          600,
          1050
        ],
        "images": [
          5010,
          600,
          5010
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          6416,
          7016,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          9116,
          9716,
          14726
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "MT Regular keeps its established head under Flood-only, Noah-only and the path retaining both nodes.",
    "reassessment": "Apply exactly the same600-year change to native LXX.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.268907+00:00",
    "sha256": "4ff94781f626a92c4cae7daa2afbd4748d281b0ef5e6ac367c2e7380cc0daf75"
  },
  {
    "step": 1445,
    "title": "Test LXX_regular at Noah and Flood",
    "question": "Do the two named coarse partitions and the path retaining both source nodes have the same inverse head?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered LXX_regular source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.270795+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4ff94781f626a92c4cae7daa2afbd4748d281b0ef5e6ac367c2e7380cc0daf75",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          1830,
          2250
        ],
        "images": [
          3810,
          5220
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5216,
          10436
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7916,
          13136
        ]
      },
      "Noah": {
        "source_legs": [
          2430,
          1650
        ],
        "images": [
          3420,
          5610
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4826,
          10436
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7526,
          13136
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          1830,
          600,
          1650
        ],
        "images": [
          3810,
          600,
          5610
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5216,
          5816,
          11426
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7916,
          8516,
          14126
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "LXX Regular shares the Flood/Noah coarse endpoint, but retaining both source nodes raises the head990.",
    "reassessment": "Test SP without modifying its accepted Fall head or Noah600 interval.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.271243+00:00",
    "sha256": "9671e8b4c38dd90b5dfb5a4a990bf26331af2f1a48154bdb9e576d85b950ac62"
  },
  {
    "step": 1446,
    "title": "Test SP_regular at Noah and Flood",
    "question": "Do the two named coarse partitions and the path retaining both source nodes have the same inverse head?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered SP_regular source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.272385+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "9671e8b4c38dd90b5dfb5a4a990bf26331af2f1a48154bdb9e576d85b950ac62",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          1700,
          1300
        ],
        "images": [
          7100,
          3100
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          8506,
          11606
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          11206,
          14306
        ]
      },
      "Noah": {
        "source_legs": [
          2300,
          700
        ],
        "images": [
          3200,
          700
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4606,
          5306
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7306,
          8006
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          1700,
          600,
          700
        ],
        "images": [
          7100,
          600,
          700
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          8506,
          9106,
          9806
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          11206,
          11806,
          12506
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "SP Regular changes by−6300 at the Noah-only partition and by−1800 when both nodes are retained.",
    "reassessment": "Because the Regular responses differ, test the same source-named600 interval in Cumulative mode next.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:14:19.272820+00:00",
    "sha256": "88b8a0de905c6dc10b68605881e0d7cbd3a5de6efee701ce4c7d7631e3c4a6dd"
  },
  {
    "step": 1447,
    "title": "Test MT_cumulative at Shem and Flood",
    "question": "Do the Flood-only, Shem-only and both-node partitions agree under the same accepted source state?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered MT_cumulative source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.573909+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "88b8a0de905c6dc10b68605881e0d7cbd3a5de6efee701ce4c7d7631e3c4a6dd",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          3430,
          9170
        ],
        "images": [
          3430,
          7190
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4836,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7536,
          14726
        ]
      },
      "Shem": {
        "source_legs": [
          4030,
          8570
        ],
        "images": [
          3040,
          7580
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4446,
          12026
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7146,
          14726
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          3430,
          600,
          8570
        ],
        "images": [
          3430,
          600,
          7580
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          4836,
          5436,
          13016
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          7536,
          8136,
          15716
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "MT Cumulative repeats the LXX Regular response: the two coarse splits agree, while the retained600 refinement adds990. Its13016 refined head is inherited, not a correction.",
    "reassessment": "Test whether native LXX Cumulative shares that balanced response.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.574817+00:00",
    "sha256": "804ee206785dd43655832b8fa6d4f9936dd2e45b913976afb5b41d6735966c34"
  },
  {
    "step": 1448,
    "title": "Test LXX_cumulative at Shem and Flood",
    "question": "Do the Flood-only, Shem-only and both-node partitions agree under the same accepted source state?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered LXX_cumulative source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.576301+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "804ee206785dd43655832b8fa6d4f9936dd2e45b913976afb5b41d6735966c34",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          4340,
          9150
        ],
        "images": [
          4340,
          5190
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5746,
          10936
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          8446,
          13636
        ]
      },
      "Shem": {
        "source_legs": [
          4940,
          8550
        ],
        "images": [
          4940,
          5580
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          6346,
          11926
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          9046,
          14626
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          4340,
          600,
          8550
        ],
        "images": [
          4340,
          600,
          5580
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          5746,
          6346,
          11926
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          8446,
          9046,
          14626
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "LXX Cumulative adds990 both when the partition moves to Shem and when both nodes are retained.",
    "reassessment": "Test whether SP Cumulative instead supplies the fully stable counterpart to MT Regular.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.576762+00:00",
    "sha256": "e30854d28a20ff37a6a9bde90b1fe55d2d143592038d2d59c1febbe494a3028f"
  },
  {
    "step": 1449,
    "title": "Test SP_cumulative at Shem and Flood",
    "question": "Do the Flood-only, Shem-only and both-node partitions agree under the same accepted source state?",
    "sources": [
      "Registered SP_cumulative source",
      "Named600 hinge source review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.578670+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "e30854d28a20ff37a6a9bde90b1fe55d2d143592038d2d59c1febbe494a3028f",
    "results": {
      "Flood": {
        "source_legs": [
          3310,
          8680
        ],
        "images": [
          1330,
          8680
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          2736,
          11416
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          5436,
          14116
        ]
      },
      "Shem": {
        "source_legs": [
          3910,
          8080
        ],
        "images": [
          1930,
          8080
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          3336,
          11416
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          6036,
          14116
        ]
      },
      "Both": {
        "source_legs": [
          3310,
          600,
          8080
        ],
        "images": [
          1330,
          600,
          8080
        ],
        "path2": [
          1406,
          2736,
          3336,
          11416
        ],
        "path3": [
          6,
          4106,
          5436,
          6036,
          14116
        ]
      }
    },
    "finding": "SP Cumulative preserves its accepted head under all three partitions, matching the MT Regular response.",
    "reassessment": "Collect all retained intermediate nodes, rather than stopping at head totals.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_heads": true,
      "same_source_total": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.579182+00:00",
    "sha256": "801f21f854c7c4b695ed24d21f789f9f741d06748d1a749d75bbb0ae47ed5445"
  },
  {
    "step": 1450,
    "title": "Retain the complete named-node comparison",
    "question": "What do the eighteen paths do to their internal600-year edge and source head?",
    "sources": [
      "Six partition comparisons"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.580542+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "801f21f854c7c4b695ed24d21f789f9f741d06748d1a749d75bbb0ae47ed5445",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          2456,
          3056,
          4106
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          6416,
          7016,
          12026
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          3960,
          3960,
          7920
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          3236,
          3836,
          5486
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          5216,
          5816,
          11426
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          1980,
          1980,
          5940
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          3106,
          3706,
          4406
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          8506,
          9106,
          9806
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          5400,
          5400,
          5400
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          4836,
          5436,
          14006
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          4836,
          5436,
          13016
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          0,
          0,
          -990
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          5746,
          6346,
          14896
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          5746,
          6346,
          11926
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          0,
          0,
          -2970
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "source_path": [
          1406,
          4716,
          5316,
          13396
        ],
        "inverse_path": [
          1406,
          2736,
          3336,
          11416
        ],
        "node_displacements": [
          0,
          -1980,
          -1980,
          -1980
        ],
        "retained_edge": 600
      }
    },
    "finding": "Every refined path preserves the explicit600-year edge; its placement and the final head respond differently to the surrounding source digits.",
    "reassessment": "Explain the whole eighteen-path table using the two local merging defects.",
    "checks": {
      "all_retained_edges600": true,
      "eighteen_paths": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:15:12.583635+00:00",
    "sha256": "f99589541a16796719ebfeff52567e10ea67962feb14970dc04f28c3744f0e96"
  },
  {
    "step": 1451,
    "title": "Derive the two local partition laws",
    "question": "Can two local additivity differences reconstruct every observed change of partition?",
    "sources": [
      "Eighteen named-node paths"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.050661+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "f99589541a16796719ebfeff52567e10ea67962feb14970dc04f28c3744f0e96",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "dL": 0,
        "dU": 0,
        "alternate_change": 0,
        "refined_change": 0
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "dL": -990,
        "dU": -990,
        "alternate_change": 0,
        "refined_change": 990
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "dL": -990,
        "dU": -990,
        "alternate_change": 0,
        "refined_change": 990
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "dL": 0,
        "dU": -990,
        "alternate_change": 990,
        "refined_change": 990
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "dL": -4500,
        "dU": 1800,
        "alternate_change": -6300,
        "refined_change": -1800
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "dL": 0,
        "dU": 0,
        "alternate_change": 0,
        "refined_change": 0
      }
    },
    "finding": "Two local defects explain all eighteen results: alternate−primary=dL−dU; refined−primary=−dU.",
    "reassessment": "Classify the exact shared responses without confusing cancellation with local additivity.",
    "checks": {
      "all_six_reconstructed": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.051662+00:00",
    "sha256": "4118f860f6c975f2660634312f7795f49b73145a8fb6bc12e01ef0eaa6360662"
  },
  {
    "step": 1452,
    "title": "Identify the complementary manuscript-mode pairings",
    "question": "When is invariance genuine at both merges, and when does it arise from cancellation?",
    "sources": [
      "Partition law"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.053664+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4118f860f6c975f2660634312f7795f49b73145a8fb6bc12e01ef0eaa6360662",
    "results": {
      "(0, 0)": [
        "MT_regular",
        "SP_cumulative"
      ],
      "(-990, -990)": [
        "MT_cumulative",
        "LXX_regular"
      ],
      "(0, -990)": [
        "LXX_cumulative"
      ],
      "(-4500, 1800)": [
        "SP_regular"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "MT Regular and SP Cumulative have two zero defects; LXX Regular and MT Cumulative have two equal−990 defects. The second pair preserves coarse totals by cancellation while refinement adds990.",
    "reassessment": "Inspect the complete source-node displacement vectors for an actual multi-node translation.",
    "checks": {
      "stable_pair": true,
      "balanced_pair": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.054244+00:00",
    "sha256": "2f4f935ce19aeaa54efac9d623fa13026d4a35fa482210a628dae010f28aef5f"
  },
  {
    "step": 1453,
    "title": "Locate translations of complete selected upper branches",
    "question": "Does any refined path translate its Flood, Noah/Shem and head by the same amount?",
    "sources": [
      "Full retained-node displacements"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.056314+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "2f4f935ce19aeaa54efac9d623fa13026d4a35fa482210a628dae010f28aef5f",
    "results": {
      "MT_regular": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          3960,
          3960,
          7920
        ],
        "uniform": false
      },
      "LXX_regular": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          1980,
          1980,
          5940
        ],
        "uniform": false
      },
      "SP_regular": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          5400,
          5400,
          5400
        ],
        "uniform": true
      },
      "MT_cumulative": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          0,
          0,
          -990
        ],
        "uniform": false
      },
      "LXX_cumulative": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          0,
          0,
          -2970
        ],
        "uniform": false
      },
      "SP_cumulative": {
        "upper_offsets": [
          -1980,
          -1980,
          -1980
        ],
        "uniform": true
      }
    },
    "finding": "Both refined SP upper branches translate uniformly: Regular by+5400 and Cumulative by−1980. The completed SP cumulative branch is its source branch+720 after the common2700 tail change.",
    "reassessment": "Relate SP cumulative preservation to MT cumulative head preservation, keeping intermediate differences visible.",
    "checks": {
      "exact_SP_regular": true,
      "exact_SP_cumulative": true,
      "only_SP_uniform": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.056646+00:00",
    "sha256": "7429ef362fd58788d72bf18414c83b9377e3d55cc58ae8c62866d10e91dd0ed2"
  },
  {
    "step": 1454,
    "title": "Explain the preserved MT–SP cumulative610 gap",
    "question": "Why does the MT–SP cumulative source-head gap survive both primary inverse stages?",
    "sources": [
      "MT and SP cumulative original and inverse legs"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.058798+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "7429ef362fd58788d72bf18414c83b9377e3d55cc58ae8c62866d10e91dd0ed2",
    "results": {
      "source_legs_difference": [
        120,
        490
      ],
      "inverse_legs_difference": [
        2100,
        -1490
      ],
      "head_gaps": [
        610,
        610,
        610
      ],
      "intermediate_gaps": [
        120,
        2100
      ]
    },
    "finding": "The common−1980 contraction preserves the610 head gap, while a1980 transfer changes component differences(120,490) to(2100,−1490). It preserves heads, not the full primary path.",
    "reassessment": "Compare the LXX upper-leg change, where the same contraction no longer applies.",
    "checks": {
      "heads610": true,
      "different_interiors": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:16:15.059219+00:00",
    "sha256": "b9e5ee53f94d1a10866561bcff00b79f5c6c8898c53485ada33f3b331cf0d5a6"
  },
  {
    "step": 1455,
    "title": "Explain the LXX–MT cumulative order change",
    "question": "How does a20-year upper-leg source difference become a2000-year reversed difference?",
    "sources": [
      "LXX and MT cumulative source legs"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.328987+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "b9e5ee53f94d1a10866561bcff00b79f5c6c8898c53485ada33f3b331cf0d5a6",
    "results": {
      "source_lower_gap": 910,
      "source_upper_gap": -20,
      "inverse_lower_gap": 910,
      "inverse_upper_gap": -2000,
      "source_head_gap": 890,
      "inverse_head_gap": -1090
    },
    "finding": "The retained lower gap910 combines with upper−20 before reversal and upper−2000 after it: source890 becomes inverse−1090. The changed decimal place explains the reordered heads.",
    "reassessment": "Use the MT/SP preserved610 gap to explain the third cumulative comparison without treating it as independent.",
    "checks": {
      "correct_gaps": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.329348+00:00",
    "sha256": "ade027f64326d69ba9af9eeca2f4ba6fe327dae84c6380a43d8af9a6b5227c68"
  },
  {
    "step": 1456,
    "title": "Close the cumulative three-manuscript comparison",
    "question": "Does the LXX–SP reversal of head order follow from the two already explained component relations?",
    "sources": [
      "LXX–MT and MT–SP cumulative comparisons"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.331691+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "ade027f64326d69ba9af9eeca2f4ba6fe327dae84c6380a43d8af9a6b5227c68",
    "results": {
      "source_gap": 1500,
      "inverse_gap": -480,
      "source_triangle": 1500,
      "inverse_triangle": -480,
      "extra_contraction": -1980
    },
    "finding": "The LXX–SP cumulative source gap1500 becomes inverse−480 because LXX contracts1980 more. This is the dependent third side of the cumulative comparison.",
    "reassessment": "Check how the Regular/Cumulative switch interacts with the LXX–SP manuscript change.",
    "checks": {
      "triangles_close": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.331947+00:00",
    "sha256": "4747521f2fa548ef145d2c98807a20abaaeb55dfb948b1c054045673b80def81"
  },
  {
    "step": 1457,
    "title": "Measure manuscript–mode interaction",
    "question": "Can manuscript change and mode change be represented by one uniform head translation?",
    "sources": [
      "Six primary inverse heads"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.334853+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4747521f2fa548ef145d2c98807a20abaaeb55dfb948b1c054045673b80def81",
    "results": {
      "SP_minus_LXX_regular": 1170,
      "SP_minus_LXX_cumulative": 480,
      "difference_of_differences": 690,
      "equivalent_mode_difference": 690
    },
    "finding": "LXX→SP shifts Regular heads1170 but Cumulative heads480; the690 interaction is exactly500−(−190). A manuscript-wide constant translation would erase this source mode dependence.",
    "reassessment": "Look for source-named interior incidences in the stable SP cumulative branch instead.",
    "checks": {
      "interaction690": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.335620+00:00",
    "sha256": "e6325edf9120176cab355ad78ae4b37a0295c2528d359f482430a8aa3d776616"
  },
  {
    "step": 1458,
    "title": "Connect the new SP interior to LXX and MT Shem",
    "question": "Does the refined SP cumulative path reach independently named Shem coordinates in the other traditions?",
    "sources": [
      "SP cumulative refined path",
      "Frozen native Rounded LXX model",
      "File51a MT cumulative Shem"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.337688+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "e6325edf9120176cab355ad78ae4b37a0295c2528d359f482430a8aa3d776616",
    "results": {
      "SP_two_stage_path": [
        1406,
        2736,
        3336,
        11416
      ],
      "SP_completed_path": [
        6,
        4106,
        5436,
        6036,
        14116
      ],
      "SP_inverse_Shem_at1406": 3336,
      "LXX_regular_Shem": 3336,
      "SP_completed_inverse_Flood": 5436,
      "MT_cumulative_Shem": 5436,
      "source_state": "nativeCainanON; common selectedTerah70 andRoundedMoses1526; strictcomparison omitsShem+2"
    },
    "finding": "The SP cumulative refined Shem node3336 coincides with native Rounded LXX Regular Shem; its completed inverse Flood5436 coincides with MT Cumulative Shem. Their path roles and anchors remain explicit.",
    "reassessment": "Connect these source-derived branches to the existing Covenant head map without claiming a full genealogical conversion.",
    "checks": {
      "LXX_incidence": true,
      "MT_incidence": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:17:04.339048+00:00",
    "sha256": "e2667ac7b93af8b7963af5b8f853a334bf0d3acff5c95db697b40ed412a47525"
  },
  {
    "step": 1459,
    "title": "Determine the scope of the Covenant head map on complete paths",
    "question": "Which corresponding nodes of the declared LXX Regular and SP Cumulative paths are carried by the existing Covenant Key?",
    "sources": [
      "C1432 anchored Key",
      "Six registered source paths"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.007293+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "e2667ac7b93af8b7963af5b8f853a334bf0d3acff5c95db697b40ed412a47525",
    "results": [
      {
        "role": "Nativity",
        "LXX": 6,
        "Key_image": "-3582/23",
        "SP": 6,
        "matches": false
      },
      {
        "role": "reversed_Conquest",
        "LXX": 4106,
        "Key_image": "98918/23",
        "SP": 4106,
        "matches": false
      },
      {
        "role": "reversed_Flood",
        "LXX": 7916,
        "Key_image": "194168/23",
        "SP": 5436,
        "matches": false
      },
      {
        "role": "head",
        "LXX": 13136,
        "Key_image": 14116,
        "SP": 14116,
        "matches": true
      }
    ],
    "finding": "The Covenant Key relates the heads; it does not map the other three corresponding primary nodes. The newly proved SP branch translations are different, explicitly local maps.",
    "reassessment": "Close the known head-level connections into a source-defined circuit, preserving this scope.",
    "checks": {
      "only_head_matches": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.008033+00:00",
    "sha256": "a9ea2b8bb50b3c56f765909f6104e3678a208eca3aad3753a9d56f0784226b86"
  },
  {
    "step": 1460,
    "title": "Close the two routes from LXX Regular to SP Cumulative",
    "question": "Does the Covenant Key agree with the supplied Prophetic/SP1700/stage/mode route?",
    "sources": [
      "C1432",
      "Comparative Study §§6.2,7.7"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.010590+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "a9ea2b8bb50b3c56f765909f6104e3678a208eca3aad3753a9d56f0784226b86",
    "results": {
      "route": [
        13136,
        13306,
        11606,
        14306,
        14116
      ],
      "edge_changes": [
        170,
        -1700,
        2700,
        -190
      ],
      "direct": 14116,
      "target": 14116
    },
    "finding": "Both routes reach14116: direct Covenant Key, or13136→13306→11606→14306→14116. The original SP1700, common2700 and SP mode−190 now form one connected circuit.",
    "reassessment": "Trace dependencies rather than counting the circuit as an independent numerical confirmation.",
    "checks": {
      "expected_nodes": true,
      "same_target": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.010963+00:00",
    "sha256": "d64d16b4dd4dea0429d82e15a2be82f2b8a6c43a920f4948588a2b4d007f55e7"
  },
  {
    "step": 1461,
    "title": "Link the source490 coefficient with preserved610 and the Covenant circuit",
    "question": "How do the local SP cap reductions participate in the three-head comparison?",
    "sources": [
      "C1432 source explanation",
      "MT–SP cumulative preservation"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.013181+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "d64d16b4dd4dea0429d82e15a2be82f2b8a6c43a920f4948588a2b4d007f55e7",
    "results": {
      "cap_loss": 485,
      "accepted_Fall": 5,
      "upper_difference": 490,
      "MT_SP_source_Flood_gap": 120,
      "MT_SP_preserved_head_gap": 610,
      "Covenant_head_gain": 980,
      "MT_LXX_regular_inverse_gap": 1590
    },
    "finding": "The source decomposition610=120+490 and the Covenant gain980=2×490 join the MT/SP head relation to the LXX/SP Key relation. Their1590 total is the same three-head triangle, not extra evidence.",
    "reassessment": "Test an apparently similar two-Key route while retaining its actual held endpoints.",
    "checks": {
      "cap490": true,
      "head_triangle": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.013847+00:00",
    "sha256": "c0f9281ff2603565e685624fa4b79bf0781e21435c3d57db697a0908331c1cce"
  },
  {
    "step": 1462,
    "title": "Test the adjacent Prophetic–Priestly composition",
    "question": "Does expanding the13306 head about Rounded MT Creation4106 reach the accepted SP cumulative head?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study13306",
      "C1432 SP14116"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.016359+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "c0f9281ff2603565e685624fa4b79bf0781e21435c3d57db697a0908331c1cce",
    "results": {
      "Prophetic_head": 13306,
      "radius_to4106": 9200,
      "Priestly_head_about4106": 14106,
      "SP_head": 14116,
      "head_difference": 10,
      "paired_intervals": [
        [
          14106,
          4106
        ],
        [
          14116,
          4116
        ]
      ]
    },
    "finding": "The composition gives14106, not14116. It produces a10000-year pair that becomes the SP14116→Actual MT4116 pair only after both endpoints translate+10.",
    "reassessment": "Check whether changing only the anchor could legitimately replace that whole-pair translation.",
    "checks": {
      "exact_miss10": true,
      "both_spans10000": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:18:32.016613+00:00",
    "sha256": "4aa67464fab1821c850433d08240b0f8642ff7b5a53651fc5310cbd633e5a2ec"
  },
  {
    "step": 1463,
    "title": "Distinguish anchor change from whole-pair translation",
    "question": "Does moving only4106 to4116 close the ten-year two-Key discrepancy?",
    "sources": [
      "Two-Key nearby route"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.202503+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4aa67464fab1821c850433d08240b0f8642ff7b5a53651fc5310cbd633e5a2ec",
    "results": {
      "original": 14106,
      "anchor_only": "324418/23",
      "both_input_and_anchor": 14116,
      "anchor_only_change": "-20/23",
      "required_pair_translation": 10
    },
    "finding": "Changing only the held anchor adds−20/23, not+10; translating source and anchor together adds10. The source states cannot be exchanged silently.",
    "reassessment": "Use a genuinely shared pair of source-appointed anchors to understand the LXX386 convergence.",
    "checks": {
      "anchor_change_exact": true,
      "whole_pair_exact": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.203276+00:00",
    "sha256": "bf92ed4bf953a6ceae9de00467615a660e59c38eb10099e10b8f4625ab603e0f"
  },
  {
    "step": 1464,
    "title": "Explain the LXX paired-Key join by its mode gap",
    "question": "Why do LXX cumulative-to-Exodus and regular-to-Conquest Priestly routes meet at386?",
    "sources": [
      "Comparative Study §4.3",
      "LXX mode difference500"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.207475+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "bf92ed4bf953a6ceae9de00467615a660e59c38eb10099e10b8f4625ab603e0f",
    "results": {
      "head_gap": 500,
      "target_gap": 40,
      "head_gap_required": 500,
      "regular_output": 386,
      "cumulative_output": 386,
      "output_difference_formula": 0
    },
    "finding": "The500-year LXX head gap is exactly(25/2)×40, the condition for the two head-held Priestly routes to share a target. The known386 join is an algebraic expression of that compatibility.",
    "reassessment": "Apply the same fixed Exodus/Conquest comparison to the other two manuscripts, retaining every result.",
    "checks": {
      "join386": true,
      "criterion_exact": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.208000+00:00",
    "sha256": "1c8a743eadabf9a6b202e7e68b557c234c8bdefba8afa10963f98bd9df4dbbd8"
  },
  {
    "step": 1465,
    "title": "Compare the paired-anchor criterion across all three manuscripts",
    "question": "Does the same head-held Priestly comparison join for MT and SP as well as LXX?",
    "sources": [
      "Six primary inverse heads",
      "Fixed anchors1446/1406"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.210491+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "1c8a743eadabf9a6b202e7e68b557c234c8bdefba8afa10963f98bd9df4dbbd8",
    "results": {
      "MT": {
        "regular_result": "5698/23",
        "cumulative_result": "6698/23",
        "difference": "1000/23",
        "predicted_difference": "1000/23"
      },
      "LXX": {
        "regular_result": 386,
        "cumulative_result": 386,
        "difference": 0,
        "predicted_difference": 0
      },
      "SP": {
        "regular_result": "6538/23",
        "cumulative_result": "7918/23",
        "difference": 60,
        "predicted_difference": 60
      }
    },
    "finding": "At the same declared anchors, the resulting separations are MT1000/23, LXX0 and SP60. Only the LXX source head gap meets the shared-target condition.",
    "reassessment": "Check how the common stage shift interacts with the Keys before treating the closed circuit as stage-independent.",
    "checks": {
      "all_predicted": true,
      "SP60": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.210931+00:00",
    "sha256": "feb6dd6f5d8eb06c20d326b36bf6df902e5813a90350f5c3ef2d7b90c71dfc21"
  },
  {
    "step": 1466,
    "title": "Measure stage–Key interaction",
    "question": "Does translating a spine by2700 commute with the existing anchored Key relations?",
    "sources": [
      "Universal stage law",
      "C1432 Covenant map",
      "LXX paired join"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:19:39.213431+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "feb6dd6f5d8eb06c20d326b36bf6df902e5813a90350f5c3ef2d7b90c71dfc21",
    "results": {
      "Covenant_two_stage_image": "257168/23",
      "SP_two_stage_target": 11416,
      "Covenant_two_stage_residual": "-5400/23",
      "LXX_two_stage_regular_join": "14278/23",
      "LXX_two_stage_cumulative_join": "14278/23",
      "positive_stage_commutator": "5400/23",
      "correction": "The first expectation used the positive-stage sign. Reducing both heads by2700 gives residual−5400/23, not+5400/23; no input changed."
    },
    "finding": "Keeping Covenant1866 fixed sends the two-stage LXX head5400/23 later than the SP target (signed residual−5400/23). The LXX paired join remains equal between modes at14278/23.",
    "reassessment": "Group successful equalities and exact misses into a compact explanatory dependency structure.",
    "checks": {
      "negative_residual_exact": true,
      "LXX_pair_still_equal": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:19.733340+00:00",
    "sha256": "df68b26433259fb63de992932047d66f9d1f759ea57a6f5802937d7aa7162783"
  },
  {
    "step": 1467,
    "title": "Compress the findings into dependency families",
    "question": "Which results add structural understanding, and which are consequences of already selected inputs?",
    "sources": [
      "Strategy §§5D,6",
      "C1432",
      "Current partition and Key records"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:19.738981+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "df68b26433259fb63de992932047d66f9d1f759ea57a6f5802937d7aa7162783",
    "results": {
      "primary_source_objects": "Six declared (F,C) pairs plus common1406/6 anchors",
      "new_comparative_extension": "One named600-year partition comparison on each source object",
      "local_explanation": "Two merging defects reconstruct all alternate and refined totals",
      "exact_partial_maps": "Two SP refined upper branches translate uniformly; no full genealogical conversion",
      "connected_existing_family": "C1432 heads and supplied1700 relation form one Key/stage/mode circuit",
      "corollaries": [
        "Cumulative three-head triangle",
        "paired Key target gap formula",
        "same shared2700 extension on every refined path"
      ],
      "not_independent": [
        "Reciprocal Key round trip",
        "sum of two sides of a date triangle",
        "alternate/refined results reproduced by their two defects"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "Promote the comparative partition law, SP selected-branch maps and closed source-named circuit. Keep residue tests and exact nearby misses in the research record.",
    "reassessment": "Express a compact reconstruction contract sufficient to reproduce the complete declared comparison.",
    "checks": {},
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:19.739282+00:00",
    "sha256": "07abd07474857f9e0c158b487d471ea54cdefd6521133046d298a6d9d3265f9f"
  },
  {
    "step": 1468,
    "title": "State the reconstruction contract",
    "question": "What must remain attached to a spine so that its relations are reproducible?",
    "sources": [
      "Six source objects",
      "Partition law",
      "Anchor and Key comparisons"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:19.742032+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "07abd07474857f9e0c158b487d471ea54cdefd6521133046d298a6d9d3265f9f",
    "results": {
      "state_fields": [
        "manuscript",
        "Regular/Cumulative mode",
        "source frame",
        "Creation/Fall head",
        "named partition",
        "held anchor",
        "operation order"
      ],
      "algorithm": [
        "Read original coordinates in the selected source frame",
        "Form either Flood-only, Noah/Shem-only or both-node source intervals",
        "Reverse each original interval once with trailing-zero places retained",
        "Sum outward from the held anchor",
        "Add the declared original1400 leg only when constructing the completed path",
        "Apply any Key about its expressly named anchor to its declared object"
      ],
      "sufficient_inputs": {
        "source_pairs": 6,
        "named_offset": 600,
        "later_anchors": [
          1406,
          6
        ]
      },
      "failure_conditions": [
        "Erasing the partition changes some outputs",
        "Uniform manuscript translation fails across modes",
        "A head Key is not a complete node map"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "One operation applied to six source pairs and three named partitions reconstructs all eighteen paths; source identity, partition and anchor are essential inputs.",
    "reassessment": "Review the independently produced algebra and source controls before drafting the new explanation.",
    "checks": {},
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:19.742350+00:00",
    "sha256": "236592f8e02459ece047603dcba5ab28e09f07648b6f45f93cd251d96cc6ac50"
  },
  {
    "step": 1469,
    "title": "Reconcile independent algebra and source reviews",
    "question": "Do independently checked partitions, source states and novelty classifications agree with the cycle results?",
    "sources": [
      "Independent structure review",
      "Independent source review",
      "Independent Key review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:20:57.313277+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "236592f8e02459ece047603dcba5ab28e09f07648b6f45f93cd251d96cc6ac50",
    "results": {
      "partition_review": {
        "status": "PASS",
        "checks": 41
      },
      "Key_review": {
        "status": "pass",
        "checks": 34
      },
      "source_findings": [
        "Latest full File52c and C1432 snapshot identical",
        "Attached short File52c retained as older source record",
        "MT Regular partitions and MT cumulative refined13016 inherited",
        "Systematic LXX/SP named600 comparison extends inspected sources",
        "LXX3836/3336 bound to complete native Rounded model",
        "SP source nodes use admitted Flood+600, no new Gear or sojourn operation"
      ],
      "promoted": [
        "complementary refinement responses",
        "SP selected upper-branch translations",
        "Shem coordinate incidences with role tags",
        "closed source-named Key circuit"
      ],
      "recording_note": "Reviewer statuses normalized case-insensitively (PASS/pass); no arithmetic check failed."
    },
    "finding": "Independent arithmetic and source reviews support the comparative extension; inherited MT results are marked explicitly and selected branches retain their source roles.",
    "reassessment": "Write the integrated explanation around the strongest results, with exact alternative heads retained in the research evidence.",
    "checks": {
      "partition_review_pass": true,
      "Key_review_pass": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:22:32.698426+00:00",
    "sha256": "8f17f0e638118479e41cfe67047e938d15140f59a2cf267f0a7d4f146468ba46"
  },
  {
    "step": 1470,
    "title": "Draft the comparative partition explanation",
    "question": "How can the verified path relationships be explained compactly without burying the main Strategy goal?",
    "sources": [
      "Partition classes",
      "SP branch translations",
      "C1432",
      "Closed Key circuit"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:22:32.701529+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "8f17f0e638118479e41cfe67047e938d15140f59a2cf267f0a7d4f146468ba46",
    "results": {
      "addition_words": 1399,
      "sections": [
        "## How the three inverse families connect internally",
        "### A named 600-year comparison",
        "### Two local differences explain all six responses",
        "### SP supplies a translated upper branch and named Shem connections",
        "### The 11270 bridge closes through the Covenant Key"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "Draft leads with the complementary partition law, then the SP branch and named Shem interfaces, and finally incorporates C1432 through the closed Covenant circuit.",
    "reassessment": "Integrate the findings into the existing explanation and update its overview and evidence scope.",
    "checks": {
      "balanced_display_math": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:23:34.091432+00:00",
    "sha256": "935bd6eff0a0628b1583aeca768a920ab0ecc4379295e9ebd6cd14ff88fb67b9"
  },
  {
    "step": 1471,
    "title": "Integrate findings with the existing family explanation",
    "question": "Can the new chapter strengthen the whole explanation while preserving unrelated source-family sections?",
    "sources": [
      "Current reader version1",
      "Comparative chapter draft"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:23:34.094432+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "935bd6eff0a0628b1583aeca768a920ab0ecc4379295e9ebd6cd14ff88fb67b9",
    "results": {
      "updated_report": "/workspace/scratch/1b40da62dcbd/c1433_c1482/deliverables/490d_Chronological_Families_Explanation_C1431.md",
      "before_bytes": 53726,
      "after_bytes": 64188,
      "unchanged": {
        "local_genealogical_families": true,
        "Keys_Covenant_NT": true
      }
    },
    "finding": "The new findings are integrated into the main explanation, overview and closing account; unrelated genealogy, Keys, Covenant and NT sections are preserved.",
    "reassessment": "Have the actual integrated prose checked against its sources and exact arithmetic before rendering.",
    "checks": {
      "local_genealogical_families": true,
      "Keys_Covenant_NT": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:23:34.095771+00:00",
    "sha256": "deefe052fbd7febfb6f9533cdc51ea358bf39dc6be69a6f65215f7b87f3d3026"
  },
  {
    "step": 1472,
    "title": "Render the revised printable explanation",
    "question": "Does the expanded report retain readable equations, tables and chapter flow in its printable form?",
    "sources": [
      "Integrated main explanation"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:24:09.757488+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "deefe052fbd7febfb6f9533cdc51ea358bf39dc6be69a6f65215f7b87f3d3026",
    "results": {
      "pdf": "/workspace/scratch/1b40da62dcbd/c1433_c1482/deliverables/490d_Chronological_Families_Explanation_C1431_Print.pdf",
      "bytes": 734454,
      "renderer_warnings": ""
    },
    "finding": "The revised report rendered successfully with no renderer warnings.",
    "reassessment": "Inspect rendered pages and equations rather than relying on a successful build.",
    "checks": {
      "pdf_created": true,
      "no_renderer_warning": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:24:48.900384+00:00",
    "sha256": "4e3f5c90d15308fba00aa2aadb628d366709660a73defcb609026e2787ddaa9a"
  },
  {
    "step": 1473,
    "title": "Inspect the printable report layout",
    "question": "Are the new chapter, tables and long circuit equation readable and unclipped in the rendered pages?",
    "sources": [
      "Rendered revised PDF"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:24:48.904551+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "4e3f5c90d15308fba00aa2aadb628d366709660a73defcb609026e2787ddaa9a",
    "results": {
      "page_count": 22,
      "layout_review": "All22 pages viewed in contact sheets; new chapter pages14–16 viewed at full readable size",
      "new_chapter_pages": [
        14,
        15,
        16
      ],
      "findings": "No clipping, table overflow, missing glyphs or broken circuit equation observed."
    },
    "finding": "The22-page printable report retains readable tables and equations; the new chapter fits on pages14–16.",
    "reassessment": "Apply the independent source review to the actual integrated prose before final arithmetic replay.",
    "checks": {
      "visual_review_pass": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:07.868159+00:00",
    "sha256": "11241b9a598e3b24e38cf282043dc01f3e366b90a782dd0a29caeb80a5f41ff4"
  },
  {
    "step": 1474,
    "title": "Review the integrated prose against source roles",
    "question": "Does the new reader chapter accurately distinguish inherited results, new comparisons, node roles and accepted states?",
    "sources": [
      "Independent reader source review",
      "Current report"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:07.872026+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "11241b9a598e3b24e38cf282043dc01f3e366b90a782dd0a29caeb80a5f41ff4",
    "results": {
      "review": "# Integrated reader review\n\nReviewed: `c1433_c1482/deliverables/490d_Chronological_Families_Explanation_C1431.md`, including the introduction, “How the three inverse families connect internally,” and conclusion.\n\n**Result: no necessary mathematical, source-role or novelty correction found.** The new findings are integrated into the larger explanation without excessive boundary discussion.\n\n- The six partition-response rows agree with their fixed source intervals. The formulas for moving the division, `d_L−d_U`, and retaining both nodes, `−d_U`, are correct. The 990 place-value explanation has its stated decimal register.\n- MT Regular refinements and MT Cumulative Flood+Shem →13016 are correctly marked inherited. The systematic LXX/SP comparison and separate MT Shem-only partition are presented as the extension.\n- The SP upper-branch claim is correctly restricted to the selected Flood/Shem/Fall nodes. Their Conquest-held shifts are all −1980; their Nativity-stage shifts relative to the original coordinates are all +720. The held terminal is explicitly outside this translated branch.\n- The **3336** incidence is confirmed in the recovered frozen `Moses_LXX_native_complete_path.json`, SHA256 `349e15040eb75bcb325bb2c83865a847266e0b60a265da53410dc040515fd403`. It explicitly lists Rounded Noah 3836, Shem 3336 and Arphaxad 3236, in the native-Cainan source state omitting Shem +2. The reader gives 3336 its proper LXX Regular role and keeps the SP generated role separate.\n- The **5436** incidence preserves its MT Rounded Cumulative Shem identity and SP inverse-Flood identity. The 610 head-gap preservation is not overstated as a whole-path translation.\n- Accepted SP Fall heads remain **4406/13396**, with lower Flood nodes unchanged. No discarded SP alternative is reintroduced as a final solution.\n- C1432's **1866** pivot is correctly the MT Minimum Covenant; the LXX source trunk retains its full-430 native-Cainan frame. The reciprocal is a Key inverse, not a second decimal reversal. The head-only scope and separate upper-branch map are clear.\n- The circuit through 13306, 11606, 14306 and 14116 is arithmetically correct and expressly shares source inputs. It is not claimed as independent evidence or a universal chronological map.\n\nThe introduction and conclusion accurately emphasize the new internal relationships while retaining the inherited source-generation explanation. No optional expansion is recommended for this review.\n"
    },
    "finding": "The source review found no required correction. The3336 incidence is bound to the frozen native Rounded LXX model; SP branch and Covenant scope are correctly stated.",
    "reassessment": "Run the portable independent arithmetic verifier against the complete accumulated models.",
    "checks": {
      "review_present": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:07.872322+00:00",
    "sha256": "178a72c8ceaec3202c1c74be704a6293407531fe13bc1530ec2d81764f3d1fdb"
  },
  {
    "step": 1475,
    "title": "Replay the complete mathematical comparison independently",
    "question": "Does numeric digit reversal and exact rational arithmetic reproduce all recorded model results and their bound sources?",
    "sources": [
      "verify_cycle.py",
      "All arithmetic models",
      "Source bindings"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:07.875585+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "178a72c8ceaec3202c1c74be704a6293407531fe13bc1530ec2d81764f3d1fdb",
    "results": {
      "status": "PASS",
      "checks": 243,
      "bound_sources": 15,
      "method": "Independent arithmetic digit reversal using integer divmod; exact fractions; research.digest-compatible canonical JSON hashes.",
      "editorial_metadata_remaining": [
        "reader_integration.json"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "Independent arithmetic replay passes, including all eighteen paths, exact Key relations and signed counterexamples; the source bindings and sequential chain agree.",
    "reassessment": "Verify the reader artifact hashes and formatting separately from the arithmetic models.",
    "checks": {
      "replay_pass": true,
      "zero_failures": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:45.376004+00:00",
    "sha256": "611dfee82a462e2c731534c904b3c940d29159db1063d21e19495941bf0acbfb"
  },
  {
    "step": 1476,
    "title": "Verify editorial integrity and retained content",
    "question": "Does the delivered Markdown match the reviewed integration and preserve unrelated sections?",
    "sources": [
      "Reader integration metadata",
      "Revised Markdown",
      "Frozen prior reader"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:26:45.379389+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "611dfee82a462e2c731534c904b3c940d29159db1063d21e19495941bf0acbfb",
    "results": {
      "tables": 18,
      "consistent_tables": true,
      "balanced_display_math": true,
      "reviewed_hash_matches": true,
      "unrelated_sections_preserved": true,
      "portable_verifier_extended": "reader hashes, preserved section bytes, word count, headings and math delimiters"
    },
    "finding": "The report matches the reviewed text; all tables have consistent columns and display math is balanced. The portable verifier now checks editorial hashes and preserved sections as well.",
    "reassessment": "Write a readable research record that distinguishes structural gains, inherited comparisons and exact misses.",
    "checks": {
      "consistent_tables": true,
      "balanced_display_math": true,
      "reviewed_hash_matches": true,
      "unrelated_sections_preserved": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:27:19.042527+00:00",
    "sha256": "7806f816e5ad76d942b6254a66ea1b807411f9fd50d17ae0429bc59964f3477b"
  },
  {
    "step": 1477,
    "title": "Write the research synthesis and step register",
    "question": "Which concise record will make all fifty reassessed actions reviewable without fifty separate reports?",
    "sources": [
      "Sequential journal",
      "Verified models",
      "Updated reader"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:27:19.046604+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "7806f816e5ad76d942b6254a66ea1b807411f9fd50d17ae0429bc59964f3477b",
    "results": {
      "research_record": "/workspace/scratch/1b40da62dcbd/c1433_c1482/deliverables/490d_C1433_C1482_Three_Manuscript_Inverse_Spine_Study_20260929.md",
      "working_record_count": 44,
      "head_table": "all18 outcomes",
      "terminology_clarification": "Refined13016 is called Conquest-held, not two-stage; a both-node refinement contains three original intervals.",
      "draft_status": "Explicitly working; final register will be regenerated afterC1482."
    },
    "finding": "The research synthesis records every tested partition, substantive connection, exact miss and step reassessment. One anchor-context label was clarified in the main report.",
    "reassessment": "Prepare a self-contained evidence packet and instructions for independent replay.",
    "checks": {},
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:30:20.159362+00:00",
    "sha256": "5164c224ec28a79b52c3066f249eec40a65ea204b61754616b23653339a0ec83"
  },
  {
    "step": 1478,
    "title": "Prepare the portable evidence structure",
    "question": "Can the research and updated explanation be reviewed without the original working directory?",
    "sources": [
      "Source bindings",
      "Exact models",
      "Reports",
      "Portable verifier"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:30:20.164635+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "5164c224ec28a79b52c3066f249eec40a65ea204b61754616b23653339a0ec83",
    "results": {
      "packet_components": [
        "updatedMarkdown/PDF",
        "researchstudy",
        "journal",
        "sourcecopies",
        "exactmodels",
        "independentreviews",
        "portableverifier",
        "inheritedmap",
        "rendercode"
      ],
      "replay": "python3 verify_cycle.py --require-50"
    },
    "finding": "The packet can reproduce the arithmetic and preserve the explanation, source editions and complete reassessment chain.",
    "reassessment": "Test its portability in a separate directory before final sealing.",
    "checks": {
      "source_copies_present": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:30:20.167172+00:00",
    "sha256": "cdce25368d3253b8d8066f3867faf67fae909892fd98ef58b3042d2057b937eb"
  },
  {
    "step": 1479,
    "title": "Check detached replay before sealing",
    "question": "Does the verifier depend only on the included relative files?",
    "sources": [
      "Portable evidence structure"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:30:20.171625+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "cdce25368d3253b8d8066f3867faf67fae909892fd98ef58b3042d2057b937eb",
    "results": {
      "status": "PASS",
      "checks": 261,
      "completed_records_in_snapshot": 46,
      "unchecked_models": [],
      "method": "Detached directory containing only evidence, models, reader artifacts, journal and verifier"
    },
    "finding": "Detached replay succeeds without original workspace dependencies; all arithmetic and editorial models are accounted for.",
    "reassessment": "Confirm the final printable wording and preserve the independent visual review.",
    "checks": {
      "portable_replay_pass": true,
      "no_unchecked_models": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:12.661840+00:00",
    "sha256": "63a25015a57211c30dab598e1b7f66eeb7f5e2df16d31d173c65cdccfff4d998"
  },
  {
    "step": 1480,
    "title": "Confirm the final reader after the anchor-label clarification",
    "question": "Did the small Conquest-held wording correction preserve layout and the reviewed mathematical content?",
    "sources": [
      "Final PDF",
      "Independent all-page review"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:12.665878+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "63a25015a57211c30dab598e1b7f66eeb7f5e2df16d31d173c65cdccfff4d998",
    "results": {
      "final_pdf_sha256": "c639b33710d92578f436f5b24d7c28bf2b72e5edbb66d2e38d16255f65cd48d6",
      "bytes": 734451,
      "pages": 22,
      "prior_independent_review": "agents/pdf_review.md",
      "final_change": "One anchor label: two-stage head → Conquest-held head for refined13016",
      "final_visual_check": "Re-rendered page14 inspected at full size; no layout defect; new chapter still pages14–16."
    },
    "finding": "The final PDF remains22 pages with a clean new chapter on pages14–16. The clarified anchor label introduces no layout problem.",
    "reassessment": "Assess whether the retained findings improve the common explanation and choose the next bounded question.",
    "checks": {
      "final_visual_pass": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:50.548305+00:00",
    "sha256": "b75a1f0445f4fa21bd995faa92275f67dee8e8089cd9ed985e69d63d5db99102"
  },
  {
    "step": 1481,
    "title": "Select the result and next bounded question",
    "question": "Which claims should carry forward as the actual advance toward the Strategy goal?",
    "sources": [
      "Integrated reader",
      "Dependency families",
      "Exact limits"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:50.552001+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "b75a1f0445f4fa21bd995faa92275f67dee8e8089cd9ed985e69d63d5db99102",
    "results": {
      "carry_forward": [
        "Complementary partition response: MT Regular/SP Cumulative and LXX Regular/MT Cumulative",
        "Two local merging defects explain all18 named paths",
        "SP cumulative selected branch translates and supplies LXX/MT Shem incidences",
        "C1432 Covenant head relation closes with the supplied1700/stage/mode path"
      ],
      "retain_as_support": [
        "Source cap490 and preserved610 decomposition",
        "Decimal-register/congruence explanation",
        "Exact Key scope and composition misses"
      ],
      "next_unexecuted_action": 1483,
      "next_question": "Apply the same local partition law to the source-appointed Cumulative Noah–Shem block (950+600) in MT/LXX/SP, retaining the current accepted inputs and anchors.",
      "not_claimed": [
        "universal full-genealogy conversion",
        "statistical independence of linked displays",
        "new historical redaction sequence",
        "second decimal reversal"
      ]
    },
    "finding": "The advance is a connected account of path behavior, selected multi-node maps and Covenant links. The next question extends the proven local rule to the existing Noah–Shem lifespan block.",
    "reassessment": "Read the full Strategy afresh and close the50-action cycle against its larger objective.",
    "checks": {},
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:50.552183+00:00",
    "sha256": "9226a941264f633c23fa2c1f9409fb9b10f2707c79c31c966eccbfaea619f56d"
  },
  {
    "step": 1482,
    "title": "Review the full Strategy and close the cycle",
    "question": "Do all fifty actions serve a compact explanation of the families rather than accumulating unrelated numerical matches?",
    "sources": [
      "Full Research Strategy v0.2",
      "C1433–C1481 record",
      "Updated explanation"
    ],
    "opened_utc": "2026-09-29T01:31:50.555515+00:00",
    "predecessor_sha256": "9226a941264f633c23fa2c1f9409fb9b10f2707c79c31c966eccbfaea619f56d",
    "results": {
      "full_Strategy_reread": true,
      "review_file": "Strategy_Review_After_C1482.md",
      "review_sha256": "ab476e90a50eefe1c3e351aceaf691df745e82a44075fe18ede2791985b26679",
      "new_comparison": "sixsourceobjects × three named partitions",
      "main_reader": "22pages; new chapter14–16",
      "next_unexecuted_action": 1483
    },
    "finding": "The complete50-action cycle meets the Strategy goal through a common local partition law, exact selected-branch maps and a connected Covenant circuit; the source-dependent limits are retained.",
    "reassessment": "Stop this cycle and deliver the revised explanation and reproducible research record. C1483 remains unexecuted.",
    "checks": {
      "full_Strategy_review": true,
      "fifty_actions": true
    },
    "closed_utc": "2026-09-29T01:32:57.315273+00:00",
    "sha256": "63a2c1e00d6bd151dbc8c279f358e52735901cb21b6bdf2f97b533ad0b2d0623"
  }
]