{
  "status": "Preparation only; no root numbered actions adopted or executed",
  "questions_before_computation": [
    {
      "id": "IF01",
      "question": "Do the three admitted regular File52c original component words exactly equal the named-node projection of the newly reconstructed MT Rounded Moses path after retaining the separate File52c Flood, Conquest and Nativity roles?",
      "domain": "C1234 MT strict base path, three regular paths from inherited completed_path_inputs; no SP or LXX substitution",
      "prediction": "1400|1050|1650; 1400|1650|1050; 1400|1050|600|1050",
      "purpose": "New representation-interface verification, not a new inverse endpoint result"
    },
    {
      "id": "IF02",
      "question": "At all five source-appointed Moses blocks, does the retained sum of row residuals recover the exact block while exposing whether rounding the block once agrees with summing row-rounded intervals?",
      "domain": "C1236 five fixed blocks only, ordered MT path C1234; no partition search",
      "prediction": "Residual sums recover every exact block; at least the Enoch-to-Arphaxad block differs from once-rounded block total",
      "purpose": "Finite diagram guard; underlying additivity failure and residual accounting are inherited, not a new theorem"
    },
    {
      "id": "IF03",
      "question": "Do the source and generated nodes that share 2456 or 4106 remain distinct under the proposed interface record?",
      "domain": "Arphaxad birth / selected Rounded Flood; original Creation / transformed Conquest leg",
      "prediction": "Equal coordinates do not equate roles",
      "purpose": "Semantic adapter validation; no new chronology is inferred"
    }
  ],
  "stop_rule": "No cross-operator survey. If these declared interfaces pass, Stage G proceeds as synthesis of already proved maps."
}