# C1127 — Audit sequential reassessment and record integrity

## Question

Is each completed action connected to its own finding and a subsequent reassessment?

## Inputs

```json
{
  "prefix_last": 1126
}
```

## Sources

```json
[
  "journal.json",
  "evidence/research.py"
]
```

## Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:40:51.032649+00:00

## Results

```json
{
  "sequential_audit": {
    "path": "model/sequential_reassessment_audit.json",
    "sha256": "ebf23d9efe94d5a9ac20472a6a1dac073f6a80fb87ce1cc7ff580a7db633bae2",
    "bytes": 412
  }
}
```

## Finding

All 195 preceding actions have ordered timestamps, intact predecessor hashes, passing checks, and explicit questions, findings and reassessments. Parallel contributions enter only through the sequential adoption records.

## Reassessment

Summarize the new explanatory gains and their remaining limits for the reader.

## Checks

```json
{
  "contiguous195": true,
  "hash_chain": true,
  "sequential_timestamps": true,
  "questions_and_reassessments": true,
  "all_step_checks": true
}
```

## Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:40:51.036133+00:00

## Record provenance

Exact record hash: `31c5a97906afe6b847d96fcb3880a7384e0ea600e3797d034ea7fd34851792c5`

Source journal: `Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json`