Research action · Preserved journal reading record

C1059 — All proper E prefixes remain fractional

Download reading recordDownload source journalOpen in research workspace

Study sequence: File52c complete-path, inverse and Key interfaces (C1058–C1070) · Rounded inverse & manuscript spines

C1059 — All proper E prefixes remain fractional

Question

Does an integral outer completion imply integral internal coordinates?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "C1058",
  "File52c §3.4"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:09:17.331603+00:00

Results

{
  "prefix_field": {
    "path": "model/completed_path_prefix_field.json",
    "sha256": "c98eb407ba3004a21db63eb3b15047d068852f258f3c057c20f80431d6650339",
    "bytes": 1594
  },
  "residues_by_path": [
    [
      6,
      2,
      0
    ],
    [
      6,
      4,
      0
    ],
    [
      6,
      2,
      4,
      0
    ],
    [
      6,
      9,
      0
    ]
  ]
}

Finding

All four paths complete14720→16000, but every proper E prefix remains fractional with denominator23. Integral outer completion is weaker than integral preservation of all source boundaries.

Reassessment

Identify the finest numerical coarsening compatible with integral E block lengths.

Checks

{
  "whole_duration": true,
  "only_final_integral": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:09:17.332262+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 00fa9a8467856f507863ed572ae15a8b117434c60c60ee28defc04087c4238ad

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json

Linked sources and evidence

Edition and provenance

C1059.md

SHA-256 fa8b2de23bede3cb6ba5b17e2af816fce7ea69fc1df64daee01ac15445384867

C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json#C1059