C1073 — Manuscript: A shared Flood boundary explains the whole SP family

Question

Does this section accurately connect its complete source family to the shared explanation?

Inputs

{
  "draft_sha256": "8e445426a955b7c62729cf55f9655ec1bf882b7d2a9c0c9cd08897355b525bae",
  "module_index": 1
}

Sources

[
  "C1071",
  "prep/manuscript_sp.json"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:13:43.661999+00:00

Results

{
  "section": {
    "path": "deliverables/sections/02_sp_2.md",
    "sha256": "516b18a2a1a45c0f27d1f01dcac1e099b72d8e8999608da4a95c461946215668",
    "bytes": 1504
  },
  "body_words": 202,
  "source_references": 2
}

Finding

The SP section presents one rule on all nine rows, preserves inclusive versus ordinary deaths, and traces the changes into the Cumulative field.

Reassessment

Reassess the next explanatory section against its source roles and the sealed calculations.

Checks

{
  "all_lives_appear": true,
  "cap_excludes_Noah": true,
  "totals": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:13:43.662736+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 8bf8d3b0028d8ab3e0368dfa4be34ff945488851595e3598151e8c94ef2f7f29

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json