C1081 — Manuscript: The weighting and continuation have distinct causes

Question

Does this section accurately connect its complete source family to the shared explanation?

Inputs

{
  "draft_sha256": "68efcbb65caf6b105191bc82703d0798f0b978d290760378e47ede645ed2fa4b",
  "module_index": 3
}

Sources

[
  "C1071",
  "prep/manuscript_round.json"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:14:30.577235+00:00

Results

{
  "section": {
    "path": "deliverables/sections/10_round_4.md",
    "sha256": "abd3e7cbf22a4d92dd6299cd2358bbc6bae3973c8d9f1e10c243cd69a853c228",
    "bytes": 1607
  },
  "body_words": 212,
  "source_references": 3
}

Finding

The junction explanation preserves the original1400-tail provenance and corrects the direction label to Rounded-to-Actual for the−2/+8 shifts.

Reassessment

Reassess the next explanatory section against its source roles and the sealed calculations.

Checks

{
  "correct_shift_direction": true,
  "licensed_continuation": true,
  "derived_weight": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:14:30.577625+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: b9a45c98416d42c5b9179b9393b9d519211c80ff59895a0b03eca241c6f716a5

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json