C1102 — Preserve adopted draft versions and clarify register scope

Question

Can the adoption history replay exactly while retaining subsequent editorial clarification?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "C1090–C1095",
  "C1058",
  "independent inverse review",
  "evidence/VERSIONED_INPUTS.json"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:21:27.098320+00:00

Results

{
  "version_bindings": [
    {
      "path": "evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v1.json",
      "sha256": "2192ba1700420439ca53813be08474790a27a916d2ef9a8d0c97d051171f8aa7",
      "bytes": 9849
    },
    {
      "path": "evidence/input_versions/manuscript_covenant_v2.json",
      "sha256": "b2355a41f23ad18fd9d780c626b5f92f2acc43f6a384082328e1cb1eeec7cb91",
      "bytes": 9869
    }
  ],
  "changed_metadata_fields": [
    "scope_note"
  ],
  "correction_ledger": {
    "path": "model/adoption_and_scope_corrections.json",
    "sha256": "926054d0d54450a9053ff679bed38aeb9205a7760b67592e5957683c8d6d633d",
    "bytes": 752
  }
}

Finding

Exact adopted draft versions now remain available for replay. The completed-path register wording is also clarified: its1400 and600 components retain two zeros; the earlier two-component theorem has a narrower register.

Reassessment

Assemble the complete reader draft using immutable sections and explicit editorial corrections.

Checks

{
  "only_scope_note_changed": true,
  "bodies_unchanged": true,
  "original_hashes": true,
  "general_operation": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:21:27.099310+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 5ad7f0fb25188aabd9cf6ed53dbb2f3dfb4498d734e998931ddbe0ce934657bf

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json