C1117 — Consolidate independent mathematical reviews

Question

Do the separate family reviews require any unresolved numerical correction?

Inputs

{
  "reports": [
    "INDEPENDENT_C953_C983.json",
    "INDEPENDENT_C984_C1007.json",
    "INDEPENDENT_C1008_C1031.json",
    "INDEPENDENT_C1032_C1057.json",
    "INDEPENDENT_C1058_C1070.json"
  ]
}

Sources

[
  "evidence/INDEPENDENT_C953_C983.json",
  "evidence/INDEPENDENT_C984_C1007.json",
  "evidence/INDEPENDENT_C1008_C1031.json",
  "evidence/INDEPENDENT_C1032_C1057.json",
  "evidence/INDEPENDENT_C1058_C1070.json",
  "C952",
  "C983",
  "C1031",
  "C1070",
  "C1102"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:34:18.766256+00:00

Results

{
  "review_register": {
    "path": "model/consolidated_family_reviews.json",
    "sha256": "9480ee042d355337a970d4a98366256c52817100016e5dc760ffdec8628820df",
    "bytes": 1782
  },
  "checks_by_review": [
    42,
    212,
    51,
    36,
    34
  ],
  "outstanding_numerical_corrections": []
}

Finding

All five family reviews pass their numerical checks. Their source, held-variable and domain corrections are carried forward explicitly, without rewriting the historical research record.

Reassessment

Apply the final integration and copyediting review to improve the reader-facing explanation.

Checks

{
  "SP_pass": true,
  "keys_pass": true,
  "covenant_pass": true,
  "inverse_pass": true,
  "review_count": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:34:18.767027+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 0341a86c9b90f25aa90d878ee4eaa870252bcf6749e46c78b7bbfc3cb0f6d81c

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json