C1122 — Audit retained scope in the completed prose

Question

Do the final explanatory claims preserve the controlling states and exclusions?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "C1119",
  "C1070",
  "C1102",
  "deliverables/components/Continuity_and_State_Ledger.md"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T04:37:13.546444+00:00

Results

{
  "scope_audit": {
    "path": "model/final_scope_audit.json",
    "sha256": "3d7c66cb91baa3e1913932253c7fd0ab6ad29e396034f55e155e8ec4c594d1cd",
    "bytes": 651
  },
  "retained_scope_checks": 13
}

Finding

The final prose retains the named source states, counting conventions, phase distinction, event claim status and deferred operations. Formal diagnostic transformations remain separate from admitted source changes.

Reassessment

Check agreement of the main numerical conclusions across the reader draft, technical reference and machine registers.

Checks

{
  "latest52c": true,
  "MT_states": true,
  "cumulative_states": true,
  "LXX_state": true,
  "SP_Terah": true,
  "calendar_counts": true,
  "phase_split": true,
  "covenant_status": true,
  "NT_scope": true,
  "deferred_operation": true,
  "formal_covariance": true,
  "tail_provenance": true,
  "no_minimality_claim": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T04:37:13.548273+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: dd71b947c64ad4a226db2464361558fb68713474485a86c82925e69326b25d56

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0932_C1131/journal.json