C1240 — Locate the conserved endpoints and shifted Reu boundary

Question

How does the130|800 repartition act on the actual named coordinates?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "C1239",
  "C1234"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T05:40:49.858686+00:00

Results

{
  "boundary_effect": {
    "path": "model/Moses_postflood_fixed_endpoints.json",
    "sha256": "d1c9d0ef76ad9721054add0426b26bf4fe4500b7d9bffd2692f6a55a97e47b5d",
    "bytes": 528
  },
  "nodes": [
    {
      "name": "Arphaxad",
      "actual_BC": 2456,
      "rounded_BC": 2456,
      "shift": 0
    },
    {
      "name": "Reu",
      "actual_BC": 2327,
      "rounded_BC": 2326,
      "shift": -1
    },
    {
      "name": "Moses",
      "actual_BC": 1526,
      "rounded_BC": 1526,
      "shift": 0
    }
  ]
}

Finding

Arphaxad2456 andMoses1526 remain fixed, whileReu moves from2327 to2326. The130|800 pattern is a controlled change of the internal division, not a change to the930-year whole.

Reassessment

Compare the two generated block measures withAdam biography without merging their source roles.

Checks

{
  "endpoints_fixed": true,
  "Reu_minus1": true,
  "names": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T05:40:49.863473+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 59cf6c59ba21b6a932756d544f38cc1af119ab618af6320ccaf63be42d7b1d89

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/journal.json