C1353 — Verify Key volume and prefix claims

Question

Does the manuscript distinguish rational path conversion from integer completion?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "draft/06b_Keys.md",
  "model/main_inverse_table_check.json"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T06:32:30.370214+00:00

Results

{
  "check": {
    "path": "model/main_Key_claim_check.json",
    "sha256": "55bc90eeefe953ac71e93795586ea584e2074e6c2c3e152d63c537f723649fc9",
    "bytes": 1219
  }
}

Finding

The three calibrated measures give one exact modeled volume, and every proper inverse prefix stays off the integer Priestly grid. These are compatible statements because the uniform path is rational.

Reassessment

Verify the Covenant table against its generated path.

Checks

{
  "common_volume": true,
  "proper_nonzero": true,
  "whole_integer": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T06:32:30.370944+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 989bb3388f9004985c6af78ad22c9bded7d06f51a4cb7c7c67aac39a56fca623

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C1132_C1431_Recovered/journal.json