C1620 — Assemble one source-to-comparison reconstruction

Question

Can the new packet be reconstructed with the existing six native spine inputs and operator inventory?

Sources

[
  "Comparative_Study §2.1",
  "Strategy §§1,5G,6",
  "source bindings"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-29T15:04:17.518785+00:00

Results

{
  "inputs": {
    "MT Regular": [
      2456,
      4106
    ],
    "MT Cumulative": [
      4836,
      14006
    ],
    "LXX Regular": [
      3236,
      5486
    ],
    "LXX Cumulative": [
      5746,
      14896
    ],
    "SP Regular": [
      3106,
      4406
    ],
    "SP Cumulative": [
      4716,
      13396
    ]
  },
  "spines": {
    "MT Regular": {
      "source_Flood": 2456,
      "source_head": 4106,
      "legs": [
        1050,
        1650
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        5010,
        5610
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        6416,
        12026
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        9116,
        14726
      ]
    },
    "MT Cumulative": {
      "source_Flood": 4836,
      "source_head": 14006,
      "legs": [
        3430,
        9170
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        3430,
        7190
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        4836,
        12026
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        7536,
        14726
      ]
    },
    "LXX Regular": {
      "source_Flood": 3236,
      "source_head": 5486,
      "legs": [
        1830,
        2250
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        3810,
        5220
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        5216,
        10436
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        7916,
        13136
      ]
    },
    "LXX Cumulative": {
      "source_Flood": 5746,
      "source_head": 14896,
      "legs": [
        4340,
        9150
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        4340,
        5190
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        5746,
        10936
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        8446,
        13636
      ]
    },
    "SP Regular": {
      "source_Flood": 3106,
      "source_head": 4406,
      "legs": [
        1700,
        1300
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        7100,
        3100
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        8506,
        11606
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        11206,
        14306
      ]
    },
    "SP Cumulative": {
      "source_Flood": 4716,
      "source_head": 13396,
      "legs": [
        3310,
        8680
      ],
      "inverse_legs": [
        1330,
        8680
      ],
      "held_nodes": [
        1406,
        2736,
        11416
      ],
      "completed_nodes": [
        6,
        4106,
        5436,
        14116
      ]
    }
  },
  "targets": {
    "Conquest_BC": 1406,
    "Nativity_BC": 6,
    "Exodus_BC": 1446,
    "restoration_BC": 536,
    "NT_civil_AD": 65,
    "Abram_birth_BC": 2166
  },
  "operations": [
    "round source lifespans within their named mode",
    "form declared original legs",
    "reverse each original leg once",
    "accumulate",
    "transport named point packets with their width convention"
  ],
  "new_operator_count": 0
}

Finding

The inherited six-spine generator supplies every inverse node used here. The new comparisons require no added reversal rule or free endpoint; they connect existing named outputs and targets.

Reassessment

Revisit the primary mode gaps as the combination of these lower Flood modules and their upper source legs.

Checks

{}

Closed utc

2026-09-29T15:04:17.520119+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 6779711d06349d46056f8ab6e4b583579d0d4fa8d7a09f4461810a1c0f27e160

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C1585_C1634/journal.json