C485 — Local repartitions explain LXX mode divergence
Question
Which Adam–Noah row operations generate regular and cumulative differences?
Inputs
{
"names": [
"Adam",
"Seth",
"Enosh",
"Kenan",
"Mahalalel",
"Jared",
"Enoch",
"Methuselah",
"Lamech"
],
"MT_b": [
130,
105,
90,
70,
65,
162,
65,
187,
182
],
"LXX_b": [
230,
205,
190,
170,
165,
162,
165,
187,
182
],
"MT_L": [
930,
912,
905,
910,
895,
962,
365,
969,
777
],
"LXX_L": [
930,
912,
905,
910,
895,
962,
365,
969,
753
]
}
Sources
[
"File18 §2.1.3 rows1228–1237, §4.1 rows1697–1706"
]
Opened utc
2026-09-27T22:38:31.325826+00:00
Results
{
"rows": [
{
"row": "Adam",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 100
},
{
"row": "Seth",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 200
},
{
"row": "Enosh",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 300
},
{
"row": "Kenan",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 400
},
{
"row": "Mahalalel",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 500
},
{
"row": "Jared",
"delta_b": 0,
"delta_remainder": 0,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 500
},
{
"row": "Enoch",
"delta_b": 100,
"delta_remainder": -100,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 600
},
{
"row": "Methuselah",
"delta_b": 0,
"delta_remainder": 0,
"delta_L": 0,
"running_regular_delta": 600
},
{
"row": "Lamech",
"delta_b": 0,
"delta_remainder": -24,
"delta_L": -24,
"running_regular_delta": 600
}
],
"Creation_to_Noah_MT": 1056,
"Creation_to_Noah_LXX": 1656,
"lifespan_delta": -24
}
Finding
Six +100 begetting moves each trade 100 from the remainder and conserve lifespan. Lamech is a separate −24 lifespan change with begetting182 fixed. One source row structure therefore produces two different chronological projections.
Reassessment
Apply the same row accounting to SP, including its completed-year boundary.
Checks
{
"six_repartitions": true,
"regular600": true,
"cumulative_minus24": true
}
Closed utc
2026-09-27T22:38:31.326136+00:00
Record provenance
Exact record hash: 934f0c51380606bedec92a8a87e13b5ef21fa6a726ba4fde385bb0948e79a0ae
Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0482_C0531/journal.json