C532 — Reconstruct the Covenant partition

Question

Does the frozen grammar reconstruct161/299/460 in File60 without selecting a new anchor?

Inputs

{
  "state": "MT Minimum/−215; whole-year principal display",
  "dates": {
    "Covenant": 1866,
    "Ishmael_birth": 1865,
    "Ishmael_death": 1728,
    "Levi_birth": 1704,
    "Levi_death": 1567,
    "Joseph_birth": 1700,
    "Joseph_death": 1590,
    "Exodus": 1446,
    "Conquest": 1406
  },
  "Keys": {
    "E": "25/23",
    "P": "70/69",
    "J": "300/299"
  }
}

Sources

[
  "File60 §§0.4,3,5",
  "C531 checkpoint"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-27T23:58:26.226362+00:00

Results

{
  "partition": [
    299,
    161
  ],
  "total": 460,
  "23_coefficients": [
    13,
    7,
    20
  ],
  "converted_parts": {
    "J_left": 300,
    "E_right": 175
  }
}

Finding

The supplied Covenant–Levi–Conquest partition is299+161=460, with coefficients13+7=20 in23-units. The existing Keys complete the arms to300 and175 without new ratios or anchors.

Reassessment

Determine whether the two arms are one uniform dilation or two distinct calendar branches.

Checks

{
  "partition": true,
  "total": true,
  "conversions": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-27T23:58:26.226557+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 47e940816cb0cc6cc9db955a52e3d1f17872f2b2d598f10d7de2f351bba9e0ff

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0532_C0631/journal.json