C620 — Normalize the family relation graph

Question

Does the demonstrated relation inventory become connected under explicitly declared module names?

Inputs

{
  "nodes": [
    "source_rows",
    "regular_cumulative",
    "covenant_clutch",
    "rounded",
    "carrier",
    "enochic",
    "calendar_keys",
    "forwarded_mirrors"
  ],
  "test": "weak connectivity of relation inventory, not identity or universal transport"
}

Sources

[
  "C614; REVIEW_C613_C616.md; C531"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T00:38:38.707891+00:00

Results

{
  "artifact": {
    "path": "model/family_graph_normalized.json",
    "sha256": "962ec17820b2cfea5677b158083f23ff773e3d69de9b33d38141fd31fce5a6b7",
    "bytes": 2030
  },
  "modules": 8,
  "edges": 15,
  "visited": [
    "calendar_keys",
    "carrier",
    "covenant_clutch",
    "enochic",
    "forwarded_mirrors",
    "regular_cumulative",
    "rounded",
    "source_rows"
  ],
  "weakly_connected": true
}

Finding

Explicit normalization resolves the earlier graph wording: the eight-module inventory is connected when direction is ignored. Every edge retains its own type and evidence. Connectivity describes the explanation’s organization, not a new arithmetic theorem or universal passage between events.

Reassessment

Finalize the exact Actual/Rounded diagram for the readable deliverable.

Checks

{
  "connected": true,
  "all_edges_typed": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T00:38:38.708381+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: e4abaf9eec7a58058ab035f5f00ba5973678aa9965fe2f69c7afd9838cdaf016

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0532_C0631/journal.json