C644 — Recover the Enoch partition of the Priestly minimum

Question

What additional placement does the appendix’s supplied Enoch close contribute?

Inputs

{
  "path": [
    4237,
    3257,
    1885
  ],
  "Enoch_status": "pre-existing secondary source comparison; no Gear transport"
}

Sources

[
  "File70 Appendix D.2–D.4"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T01:00:01.628554+00:00

Results

{
  "partition": [
    980,
    1372
  ],
  "jubilee49_coefficients": [
    20,
    28
  ],
  "primitive196_coefficients": [
    5,
    7
  ],
  "whole": 2352
}

Finding

The supplied Enoch close partitions2352 as980+1372, or20+28 jubilee49 units. The reduced ratio is5:7. The total follows from the rail geometry; this particular internal cut depends on the separately supplied3257 role.

Reassessment

Test the corresponding Enoch head to identify which part of the partition is role-specific.

Checks

{
  "partition": true,
  "total": true,
  "ratio": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T01:00:01.628730+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: c26f666a0f60b1a78231c0ab16fe7c353022d0aa312dbcfb172e373a516d55a2

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0632_C0731/journal.json