C703 — Apply source-role and unit review

Question

Which wording distinctions are needed before integrating the micro/macro result?

Inputs

{
  "reviewed_steps": [
    689,
    690,
    691
  ],
  "source_locator": "Supplement A §10.3",
  "residual_count": "5/2",
  "calendar_length": 336
}

Sources

[
  "Reviewer C677–C690; Supplement A §10.3"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T01:18:04.546019+00:00

Results

{
  "corrections": {
    "C689": "The840-day interpretation is derived by applying the336-day calendar to the source-defined2.5 phase residual.",
    "C690": "14006 is the native Rounded head;14146 and14846 are generated comparison heads. The matrix locator is§10.3.",
    "C691": "Read2.5 additional336-day calendar units, totaling840days; not840 such units. The macro analogue has its own declared year units.",
    "phase_centers": "Bare2871/2911 here are Nisan coordinates; corresponding Tishri coordinates are0.5 greater."
  },
  "residual_days": 840,
  "macro_year_gain": 840
}

Finding

Independent review confirms the arithmetic and identifies three source-role/unit wording refinements. These corrections supersede the affected interim prose; all final explanations will distinguish native14006, generated companion heads, and the derived residual-volume interpretation.

Reassessment

Test the literal twelve-node source phase field through its declared affine reflection.

Checks

{
  "residual": true,
  "macro": true,
  "native": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T01:18:04.546366+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 268e41f4e6704830c7402278c598853c0df06de53065e163d18b9506b15287f1

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0632_C0731/journal.json