C735 — Transport the whole bridge to the lower envelope

Question

Does the chosen completion profile preserve the row-generating law?

Inputs

{
  "cumulative_profile_shift": -2,
  "regular_frame": "+215",
  "scope": "all selected cumulative lower-envelope members, not newGeartransport"
}

Sources

[
  "File18 §6A envelopes; C734; C731 Actual bridge"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T01:42:09.389460+00:00

Results

{
  "lower_profile": [
    9890,
    9090,
    8283,
    7468,
    6628,
    5798,
    4998,
    4698,
    3916,
    3321,
    2873,
    2373,
    1970,
    1567,
    1137,
    928,
    721,
    521,
    402,
    267
  ],
  "center_to_lower": [
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2,
    -2
  ],
  "terminal": 267,
  "completion_head": 9890
}

Finding

Selecting the lower-envelope member translates the entire MT bridge by−2 and preserves every adjacent generator. It recovers9890 at Creation and267 at Abraham. This is a source-defined profile choice, not an adjustment fitted independently at each node.

Reassessment

Transfer the same full-field recurrence to nativeLXX, retaining its insertedCainan row.

Checks

{
  "head": true,
  "terminal": true,
  "all_differences": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T01:42:09.389655+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: c0ee20dbda2acf632a6abf6a40e4a4df68db42a2419d459815e53a4c12ea99e9

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json