C781 — Separate the secondary cumulative block translation

Question

Does the source Rounded cumulative+60 block come from raw MT Terah repartition?

Inputs

{
  "source_blocks": [
    [
      14011,
      14006
    ],
    [
      14071,
      14066
    ]
  ]
}

Sources

[
  "File51a §23.7; C779–780"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T02:01:47.375287+00:00

Results

{
  "raw_lifespan_change": 0,
  "secondary_block_change": [
    60,
    60
  ],
  "scope": "source-admitted displayed macro block; no unlicensed full-genealogy extension"
}

Finding

Both operations are legitimate in their stated domains, but their outputs differ: raw lifespan-preserving Terah change gives0 cumulative shift; the secondary display block explicitly moves60. Their provenance must accompany the variant name.

Reassessment

Compare Cainan support across regular and cumulative representations.

Checks

{
  "different_operations": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T02:01:47.375565+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: ba94d15486312c214f3d075f8a65e3ceca6ec03829607eee19c8369da8051be9

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json