Research action · Preserved journal reading record

C785 — Distinguish zero row residual from zero coordinate residual

Download reading recordDownload source journalOpen in research workspace

Study sequence: Cainan, Terah and Sojourn variants (C772–C791) · Regular & Cumulative

C785 — Distinguish zero row residual from zero coordinate residual

Question

What residual does the inserted MT Cainan boundary inherit?

Inputs

{
  "regular_Shelah": [
    2421,
    2421
  ],
  "cumulative_Shelah": [
    4393,
    4396
  ]
}

Sources

[
  "File51a paired rows; File18 Cainan130/460"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T02:02:48.677719+00:00

Results

{
  "regular_Cainan": [
    2551,
    2551
  ],
  "cumulative_Cainan": [
    4853,
    4856
  ],
  "residuals": [
    0,
    3
  ]
}

Finding

The inserted local durations are already round, but the cumulative Cainan coordinate inherits Shelah’s+3 residual:4853→4856. Local exactness and coordinate exactness are different properties.

Reassessment

Check Terah triangle compatibility with both rounding selectors.

Checks

{
  "regular": true,
  "cumulative": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T02:02:48.677947+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 76684580621cf081e99ba1ffd4554760a41ffeca85473f02b1256844bad31b59

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json

Linked sources and evidence

Edition and provenance

C785.md

SHA-256 df0aa21207ed23417c663600b11ee0bb530be48cafd7bd3499079a4165ee99f9

C480–C1634/Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json#C785