C818 — Make the principal date-state distinctions explicit

Question

Which repeated labels need a role and construction attached?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "File18/File51a; C751,C766,C763; independent reviews"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T02:12:33.608733+00:00

Results

{
  "states": {
    "path": "model/date_state_cards.json",
    "sha256": "55358f0c2c7d8072988a555d1042be9f6f1e85a72e7b0ce53015b5832282d456",
    "bytes": 834
  },
  "examples": {
    "MT_completion_gap": 9890,
    "MT_strict_actual_gap": 9894,
    "MT_rounded_gap": 9900
  }
}

Finding

Dates must be read as state-labelled coordinates. The values9890,9894,9900 answer three different declared comparisons; identical14006 or13401 labels do not erase construction differences.

Reassessment

Assemble the complete source-grounded synthesis draft.

Checks

{
  "gaps": true,
  "duplicate_labels_retained": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T02:12:33.609252+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 4238920446962b7ca4387414630db153f58081c408aef33d493d4205d21aaefe

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0732_C0831/journal.json