C926 — Accept the final independent text disposition

Question

Are the final reading versions consistent with source roles and verified fields?

Inputs

{}

Sources

[
  "REVIEW_FINAL_TEXT_PREFLIGHT"
]

Opened utc

2026-09-28T03:06:27.811537+00:00

Results

{
  "acceptance": {
    "path": "evidence/FINAL_TEXT_ACCEPTANCE_C926.json",
    "sha256": "ba6801b6331eac1ac58fc4e7dd73cd7bfff11d0827e1f1d7d30591cb92cfa7dc",
    "bytes": 1764
  },
  "checks": 12,
  "bound_reading_files": 5
}

Finding

The independently reviewed final synthesis, companion, guide and map are accepted at their exact current hashes. All identified prose issues are resolved, with no numerical model changes.

Reassessment

Write the final continuity checkpoint and next unused action number.

Checks

{
  "PASS": true,
  "checks": true,
  "five_files": true
}

Closed utc

2026-09-28T03:06:27.813476+00:00

Record provenance

Exact record hash: 74a92b69ac25156d10aa687aa6309312c09bdda23aa15e9a2ae5a07167fba75c

Source journal: Research_Cycles/C0832_C0931/journal.json